Life is hard for fools.

The Syrian PKK with the approval of the PKK leadership troika is preparing to face the Turkish vampires, in cynical alliance with the forces of Assad (the official Baathist state).
I support the PKK, I support its necessary cynical alliances with whoever, because Turkey must be crushed, and I will not listen to the whining and moralizing of those who relied on the Turkish vampires to fight the Baathists.
Life is hard for fools.

 

The Iran-Turkey-Russia triangle lit fires in Iraq, again. But this triangle will break, and then some will wonder, again, why it is not the satanic west and the diabolical Israel that will be to blame, again.

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

 

 

Sîmar - Heval Hatin

A parenthesis.

 

A parenthesis.

When you say you'll make it to the end, make it, otherwise don't say it.

--

Declaration.

When I, the "petty bourgeois nationalist"* will declare that I will go to the end I will go to the end.

 

* I apologize to myself for using the terminology of my totalitarian enemies.

---

 

 

The ethics of modern radicals is unfortunately overwhelmed by all forms of apotheosis of the concept/situational of ''inclination''.
Right-wing radicals deify national/religious inclination and leftist/anarchist radicals deify the class inclination, in a contest of moralistic immorality and propaganda orgasm.

---

 

Don't just blame the Islamists for their adherence to the imposition of the headscarf (Hijab), you moralists of neo-communism and old faces of Stalinism-Trotskyism-anarchism, but look deep inside how many headscarves and how many burqas you have worn οn your deeply puritanical mind.

You have perverted the use of language with your metaphorical excesses, your extreme use of extensions of literal meanings through arbitrary metaphorical modifications of them.

You see everything as "capitalist spectacle", as "pornography", as "colonization".

Come to your senses imagined and worn-out pseudo-representatives of the proletariat.

Wake up from your moralist slumber, and try to think like everyday people.

 

 The neo-ethicists of the section of the new left who revive the ''anti-spectacular'' deep puritanism of the Stalinist (and not only, unfortunately) Puritan virgins make me either laugh endlessly or vomit.

---

 

The leaders of the modern humiliated subordinate social classes will not "come" from the arrogance of Agamemnon, nor from the anger of Achilles, they will not be spiteful and pseudosubversive like the Thersites of the masses, they will not be a synthesis of all these like Caesar.
If there are leaders, by no means is it certain, they will be leaders who will not want to be leaders, but they will not have also the syndrome "I don't want to be a leader, but I want to be a leader, because I hate my father complexly, being a would-be father myself."
They will come from the bottom of the commonplace, the everyday, they will simply do their duty to stand up when everything will call them to bow down and submit.

--- 

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

 

 

 

Materialism

Materialism even if not founded in reductionism is one of the ontologies.
If also thought, will, etc. are "matter" "materials", then I philosophically support Materialism, but this expanded version of it, not every version of it.
This "expanded" materialism is the Ontology I advocate.

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

 

 

Hesen Sherif Te Nezanî

Ali BARAN -(BARAN) Nabi Nabi

Η αυτοάμυνα των λαών και οι ουδετερόφιλοι απατεώνες..

 

 https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02CWv3PdkDRA2afMr8qZy9yiNMq3mYEGZTscNs6FtDBmzXdh7s4epF6UdmdowppAnSl&id=100059263519392&sfnsn=mo

 

 

Gulîzar

You know, it's hard..

You know, it's hard: 

To want to overcome some ideological limitations of your past, and those who are supposed to express what transcends your own "old" limitations drag you back from those boundaries, send you back to the past, because, that, that you believed in the past is confirmed and everything disproves what it says that it overcomes it.

Our old left-wing nationalism, our slandered, as gray-red, leftism, the one that made us black sheep within the left, is vindicated again.

Those of us as "left nationalists" who supported the PKK, those of us in Greece who emphasized the expansionism of "eastern empires" such as Russia and the (returning) (possible) empire of Turkey, were not and are not gray-red.

And our accusers, the then super-super internationalists, now show reduced reflexes, most of them, in the face of both the Russian and the Turkish imperialist danger.

Others were slanderously included in the gray-red front (which still exists today and is pro-Russian) and others, formerly our accusers, are retreating in the face of the new fascist danger from the east.

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

 

 

 

''It is like their whole “activism” is a joke..''

Via Adina Danes
The head of the Russian State Duma Committee of Defence has openly and directly declared that: “There will be no peace on their terms, let alone on the terms invented by Ukraine. 

It’s not going to happen!...It will be an unconditional surrender. 

Now Putin uses food, heat, light, gas as a weapon. He’ll probably start using the kids’ toys in this way, too, and damn them – if they want that!”. 

But even if all members of the Russian Duma would write these words on their forehead, the “anti-imperialist” “left” would still put the blame for the bombing and blockages of food shipments on Ukraine and US. 

The more bombs fall on Ukraine, the more these leftists repeat that it is Ukraine's and US fault. 

The more problems derive from the war, like the blockage of the cereals that affects the global south, the more is Ukraine's fault. 

Over and over. 

If tomorrow another city in Ukraine, including all its civilian buildings, is put to the ground, there are going to be 100 comments from these people who say “look what the puppet Ukraine and its US master are doing”. 

It is not only absurd, but surrealist how these people who claim to fight for social emancipation and against oppression have gone this low. 

It is like their whole “activism” is a joke.

Waştîya Raştîyê

Natore

Sena Dersimi - Sebra Dilê We Ka (2015)

Δεν υπάρχει «α-» ή «προ-»..

 

Ακόμα και τις «ανεπαίσθητες αντιλήψεις» τού Λάιμπνιτς (σίγουρα υπάρχει καλύτερη μετάφραση), οι οποίες δεν καταχωρούνται από εμένα στην εμπειρία και την ικανότητά της, δεν τις βλέπω-ερμηνεύω σαν υπάρχουσες «μέσω» ενός «προ-» ή ενός στερητικού «α-».

Η ανθρώπινη σκέψη, ίσως και η ζωική σκέψη γενικότερα, θαρρώ δεν έχει «από κάτω» της κάποιον «πυθμένα» που ορίζεται σε ένα ά-σκεπτο α-συνείδητο προ-συνειδητό, ή προ-κατηγοριακό πλαίσιο κ.λπ,

Στο υπόστρωμα τής αισθητηριακής αντίληψης, εκεί όπου κυριαρχεί η δεκτικότητα και η «παθητική σύνθεση», υπάρχει, και εκεί, γλώσσα Λόγος λέγειν, και ό,τι παραμένει εκτός αυτών δεν είναι «κάτι» που ως έλλειψη τους τα παράγει ως «επόμενα» σε κάποια προϋπάρχοντα στοιχεία, ή και (ως επόμενα) σε μη-υπάρχοντα στοιχεία με την απόλυτη έννοια. 

Η «μη-κατηγορικότητα» λόγου χάριν, ή η «μη-ικανότητα» (η «δεκτικότητα» ως «μη-ικανότητα», όταν συμβαίνει αυτό, διότι υπάρχει επίσης η «δεκτικότητα» ως μέρος τής ικανότητας) δεν σημαίνουν την προϋπαρξη άλλων «αρνητικών» ή «κενών» «οντοτήτων».

--

Ακόμα και στο «χαμηλότερο» «υποστρωματικό» υπο-πεδίο τής «αισθητηριακής δεκτικότητας» (διότι η «αισθητηριακή δεκτικότητα» μπορεί κι αυτή να περιέχει και «δεκτικότητα» και «ικανότητα»), δεν δέχομαι ότι υπάρχει «κάτι» που υπερβαίνει το «μη-» μέσω ενός «προ-» ή ενός (στερητικού) «α-» (σε σχέση με τον όρο νοητική ή εμπειρική ικανότητα, κατηγορική σκέψη, συνείδηση κ.λπ).

---

Ξαναθυμήθηκα το ερμηνευτικό/μεταφραστικό πρόβλημα με το a priori τού Καντ. Δεν μπορεί να εννοηθεί μάλλον ως προεμπειρικό στοιχείο τής σκέψης, ούτε όμως και ως αμιγώς υπερεμπειρικό, εφόσον υπάρχει η έννοια της καθαρής a priori εποπτείας, που σχετίζεται με αποκλειστικά δύο υποστάσεις της, τον χώρο και τον χρόνο, οι οποίες είναι μεν μη άμεσα εμπειρικές αλλά ως άμεσες προϋποθέσεις των άμεσων αντιλήψεων και αισθητηριακών εμπειρικών αντιλήψεων δεν μπορούν να νοηθούν ως αμιγώς υπερεμπειρικές. Το a priori ως το εκ των προτέρων νοητικό στοιχείο τής ίδιας τής νόησης χρειάζεται προσεκτική επανερμηνεία, ίσως υπό το φως μιας επαναφοράς του ως γλωσσικονοητικής δομής.

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

 

 

Sena Dersimi - Roye (Asmê Û Per)

Xezal-Ferzê (Xem-2014)

Nizamettin Ariç , Dayê - Rojek Tê

Delil Dilanar - Qerîn

Τι ντροπή.

 

Θα πω την κακία μου: 

Η «παθητική σύνθεση» τού Deleuze, το τελευταίο (βιταλιστικό) οχυρό τού μεταφυσικού υλισμού.
Τι ντροπή.

 

Η έννοια και η οντολογική κατάσταση τής «ικανότητας» «περιέχει» θαρρώ την έννοια τής «δεκτικότητας», χωρίς να συμβαίνει πάντα το αντίστροφο.

Καμία σχέση με τις μαλακίες τού Deleuze.

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

 

 

 

 

Τhe "innocence-guilt" game

 

I can play the "innocence-guilt" game, even with those hypocrites who say they don't play it, but at the bottom of my mind moralism, especially moralism of hypocrites, is a discount to thought.

There are innocent and guilty, according to time and historical circumstance, but the ontological scales of "innocence-guilt" smell of blood, dominance, potential or active, religion, hidden or open, slanders, persecutions, humiliations.

I will emphasize in my analysis the most "innocent", the most insidious priesthood, the modern sacred examination, and reveal its moral-ontological hierarchies.

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος