Questions to Michael Karadjis.

 

Questions to Michael Karadjis.

1. Is the new imperialist world multipolar or (potentially) (again) bipolar?

2. Is the territorial-centric aspect of the new "Eastern" imperialism (as its reactionary aspect) a complementary or an essential element of it?

3. The necessary alliance with the "enemy of the enemy" is a cause of the alienation of the sectarian anti-imperialists of the West, but does it not also pose a danger to the leftists of the East "from the other way around"? Beyond wishful thinking, how and when will the peoples of the whole world meet, when they are thus divided into opposing, necessarily, allied formations?

4. Solve the mystery of the Syrian opposition for me. Aren't the vast majority of the anti-Assad opposition entirely or partial responsible for the jihadism diversion? Caution! I am not saying that the Syrian opposition was (and is) entirely and predominantly jihadist, as the Russian imperialists, Assad and the leftist Stalinist anti-imperialists say, but I am saying that the opposition has responsibilities:

a) because it tolerated the phenomenon, perhaps allied itself with them b ) put Turkey in the game from the beginning, c) it did not for a moment overcome theocracy and political Islam, d) it remained fanatically anti-Kurdish.

Is it so, or not? am I simplifying or saying what is hidden through idealizations?

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

 

 

Anti-ukrainische Kriegspropaganda

 

 

Ende eines dreiseitigen Textes über den ukrainischen Nationalismus, oder das, was der Autor dafür hält. 

Der Gedanke ist so deprimierend, dass das Leute lesen könnten, die sich mit der Geschichte des Donbaskrieges nicht so gut auskennen (und vielleicht Rolf Surmann als ja nicht völlig unzurechnungsfähigen Historiker kennen), und dann am Ende wirklich denken, die ukrainische Armee (obwohl nein, es war vor allem das Asow-Regiment persönlich, steht im Absatz drüber) hätte aus reinem Ethnonationalismus diesen Krieg angezettelt, ach was, die Bevölkerung dort, die doch nur russisch sein wollte, "systematisch" bombardiert. 

Man kann das eigentlich nicht anders nennen als anti-ukrainische Kriegspropaganda.

  

Paul Simon

 

The genie in Aladdin's lamp, is out.

 

Most people want to rest within some limits, in the "space" that remains when they "remove" the boundary that delimits that "space" (and any "space").

But the limit, every limit, is this situation that constitutes what "remains" beyond its "self" as a limit.

So our good people, everyday people, priests, ideologues, theologians, discover at some point that in their supposedly non-negotiable "space" there exists the "demon"-limit, and they also learn that this very "demon" makes their resting place a precarious and volcanic place.

They then try to banish, exorcise, expel this precarious and always mixed element, and start the ideological and theological wars, giving this boundary subtantial names and markings.

The fascist then discovers the "Jew" and the sectarian communist the petty bourgeoisie.

All of them are looking for the inner enemy that disturbs the tranquility of their repose within some imaginary non-boundary place-space.

They would all like the boundaries to exist but not bother them so much, to be far from home, in some undefined remote region, somewhere where people live with blurred boundaries and unclear identities.

However, these "distant ones" appear at some point in the quiet dead homes of the confident people, and that's when the "holy fight" of the confident people begins.

I inform them:

The genie in Aladdin's lamp, is out.

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

 

 

Limit

 

Limit/boundary blows up all ontologies.
We are on the limit-line, we are in the limit-line, we are the limit, Ukrainians Greeks Kurds Jews, and we will fuck your ideological holyhouse.

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

 

 

The deeper racism

 

The strongest racism is the racism against blacks/blackness, but the deeper racism is the racism against mongrels.

The mongrel as an entity, in a wider context, is the object of hatred of all ''clear'' "natures".

The mixture is, among other things, a limit, a repressed limit which, acting as an element of those it delimits, reveals them as non-existent, as autogenous.

But even if the pseudo-autogenous "clear" beings "accepted" the "role" of the mongrel-boundary, this (as a possible fact) would not save them from radical questioning, possibly even exposing them to the state of extinction.

For this reason, every limit-mix is ​​unspoken and implicit in every ontological system of thought and action, also in those systems that project themselves as open to the fertility of limits, thus (project themselves) as alien to every ontology.

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

 

 

The logic of equal distances in the face of a conflict.

The logic of equal distances in the face of a conflict, from the point of view of a third (individual or collective) subject, is not generally right or wrong. 

Everything is determined by the circumstances that shape the moral and political quality of the factors of the controversy. 

The criterion for whether we will follow the attitude of equal distance or support the one against the other (in a conflict) is a criterion of a moral ideological and socio-class nature.

--

One more point to determine a more correct stance in a confrontation. 

When we do not need or should not distance ourselves from all the actors in a conflict (there is also this possibility as well as the possibility that we should support the one factor against the other), when we must take a clear position in favor of the one factor, this does not mean that maintaining a kind of parallel "equal distance" may be ruled out. 

Example: 

It is generally right to support the Syrian opposition to Assad, in general, but this does not mean that it is impossible to do so while keeping (alongside) an equal distance between Assad and the Syrian opposition. 

The FSA is now a covert jihadist gang..

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

 

 

Scums

The imperialism of our time comes from the east, and signals the reactionary desire for the return of territorial-centered empires. 

The West is a vulgar thing, the East something even more vulgar, which is dressed in whatever anti-imperialist rag it finds in the cheap leftist bazaar of ideas.

 

The global reversal of imperialistic polarities has dissolved leftist minds. The East is paving the way for the reactionary resumption of imperialism, and even the fascist Trump took his "lights" and other "impulses" from the East. The east is playing the drums of sexist patriarchal theocratic ideas, the east aspires to resurrect territorial-central empires, and the left continues to search for the "root of evil" in the west.
This blindness does not mean that the left honors the eastern peoples, on the contrary, it despises them because it treats them as incapable of "fixing" their own monsters (I speak necessarily allegorically). 

Meanwhile, while the Western post-colonial anti-colonial left seeks to find that Western colonialism remains colonial even though it does not "send" settlers or annex territories (even the latest Western imperialist action in Iraq did not have as its ultimate goal the annexation of territories), does not see before her eyes the evolving typical, well-known, "classic" imperialism of the new east that sends settlers and missionaries, annexes territories, and plans new territorial empires.
In order for the (mainly) western left to find the "indirect" "secret" "invisible" imperialism of the west, it forgets to look in front of its eyes the obvious blatant direct imperialism of the new east.

 

When things they turn over,  I do not demand that you stand up from the beginning, but it is ridiculous to insist that you want to walk with your legs in the sky and your head broken on the ground. 

 

Leading member of the Greek left (Syriza), expresses the pro-Russian nonsense and immorality of the left in Greece.

Speaking to the Greek radio and television station SKAI, Dimitris Tzanakopoulos said that "the security policy, which NATO is currently pursuing, has led to a complete impasse, to a large extent it was the cause of the current conflict and the Russian invasion. 

With regard to NATO enlargement, we consider it unnecessary and is one reason that could rekindle the crisis. 

Here we need another security policy"(27/6/2022).

Mr. Tzanakopoulos also said that NATO is to blame for the invasion of Ukraine and will be to blame for any "resurgence of the crisis"!

---

 

You are Protesting because I characterize as a whole the Turks and the Russians as scums?
Say what you want, but if these people continue to support by 80% of their fascist expansionist and pro-war political tendencies and leaderships, I have every right to call them scums.

 

The vast majority of Russians and Turks support purely fascist expansionist parties and bloodthirsty politicians.
The people have the leadership they deserve.
Kemalist ''democrats'' are worse than Erdogan, the ''gray wolves'' worst of all (an underworld party, not just fascists but also drug dealers, etc.) and there is Aksener's fascist party.
We are talking about about 90% of population favor fascist parties.
The only non-fascist party in Turkey is the ... Kurdish.
To say that today's Turks are scum is not an ethnic characterization but a statistical statement.
If Turkey loses strategically, we will discuss them again. 

I am not a Greek or a right-wing or left-wing patriot. 

I hate Turkey, and that is where my national / ethnic identity ends.

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος