Turkey threatens to intervene in northern Syria, but has already intervened in Northern Iraq, hitting not only the PKK but also civilians there. In the meantime, it continues to threaten Greece, continuing the double game between NATO and the "new east" (Iran, Russia, China).
I don't know where all this will end, but I think the time has come to decide the future of Turkish neo-Ottoman expansionism and the precise position of the Turkish state in the new system of imperialist rivalries.
Postscript, relative/unrelated to the preceding:
Who will finally eliminate the monstrous genocidal bastard Hakan Fidan?
This is the director of the fascist secret service of the Turkish state, who, for those who do not know, comes from a family-clan of Kurdish traitors and collaborators with the Turkish state.
He is a Turkified Kurd who has betrayed his origins (as a member of a treacherous tribe).
He is co-responsible for the genocide of the Yezidis, and is a co-founder of ISIS.
I don't know if it is "intuition", knowledge or a result of "dialectical analysis", but I am sure that the beginning of the solution to the revolutionary problem of our time, and the overcoming of the theoretical-practical contradictions that concern us, is at the crossroads that it's called Iran.
The specifically but not generally correct: "down with capitalism" is not enough.
The modern exploitative system is the "wage labor system", which includes both as an analytical and as a socio-ontological material term both capitalism and post-capitalist non-capitalist exploitative systems such as state socialisms (such as the Soviet Union) which they were NOT capitalistic - not even as state-capitalistic - but they were exploitative societies, in which the aforementioned term "wage labor system" applied.
It is strange to know that the solution to the riddle (also in "east") is workers' democracy of open workers' councils and assemblies, but not to be able to find a single road, a path, that leads there.
The destructive competition of the "Western" and the emerging "Eastern" capitalists and states, the two new poles (not forgetting the many other intra-capitalist antagonisms), leads only to the destruction of societies, but the path that leads to the overcoming of these poles and in overcoming the wage labor system, it is still closed.
1. The newer Kurdish nationalism did not carry out ethnic cleansing, it is not racist nationalism, it is largely influenced by liberal and leftist political values.
2. The PKK did not exclude the Syrian opposition fools, the Syrian opposition fools was wich under the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood, Al-Qaeda, and especially under the influence their friends Turkish fascists, and forced the PKK to maneuver between the US and Assad, to defend the life of the Kurds but also of many democratic Arab citizens.
3. The PKK, apart from the usual deviations observed in war, did not commit mass war crimes, massacres of civilians, rapes and beheadings, which is why it became the only factor in the entire region, which the west (for the its own reasons) could be relied upon for a cynical alliance.
4. The PKK is the subject of slander, suspicion, exclusion, also by many leftist forces in the west, whether they are pro-Assad or anti-Assad.
To PKK do the favor of living up to the standards of their occasional detractors would be folly.
But he has shown a willingness to communicate and compromise with those who want a democratic solution in Syria and elsewhere.