Idiots

The first stupid "pro-peace" activists have appeared in Madrid, shouting that the war in Ukraine is being instigated by NATO. 

The same is said by the Islamo-fascist Erdogan and his dogs about the war against Greece that he wants to set.

There is always a way to be at the same time a leftist and an idiot tool of every fascist. 

Leftists must be careful. 

If they think they possess the truth, without being careful to control its use, they become worse than the right, because of their infinite stupidity.

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

Draft

Draft of philosophical political question: There can be philosophical politics and finally ideological critique and criticism, by like-minded people, of the cynical alliances of a political subject, which can be based as a critique on a common and generally valid criterion within the ideological community of like-minded people?

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

Τσακαλώτος: ο απόλυτος διανοούμενος βλάκας.

Ο Τσακαλώτος έδειξε αυτό που  πιστεύουν οι τού ΣΥΡΙΖΑ για την αντιμετώπιση τής τουρκικής απειλής.

Αρκεί να υπάρξει, λέει, μια συμφωνία όπως αυτή των Πρεσπών, μεταξύ των Ελλήνων και των (Σλάβων) Μακεδόνων (που είχαν ένα μεγάλο μέρος τού δίκιου μαζί τους) (να γίνει και ένα γλείψιμο στους Ρώσους φασίστες, λέει όλος ο ΣΥΡΙΖΑ), και λύθηκε το πρόβλημα, έτσι πιστεύει ο βλαξ Τσακαλώτος.

Οι άνθρωποι αυτοί, ο ΣΥΡΙΖΑ και το διανοούμενο λουμπεναριο που σέρνεται πίσω του, είναι επικίνδυνα ηλίθιοι, μιας και μόνο επικίνδυνοι ηλίθιοι μπορούν να ζυγίζουν σαν ίδιο το βάρος και το περιεχόμενο αυτών των δύο διαφορετικών διαμαχών  (Ελλάδα-Μακεδονία και Ελλάδα-Τουρκία).

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

Ακροδεξιά αντι-μεταναστευτική βία

 The extreme right-wing inhuman violence against immigrants at the Greek-Turkish maritime border committed by the Greek government through the Greek Coast Guard is not only unacceptable and shameful for the Greek nation but also nationally dangerous for it as it provides objective arguments to the fascist Turkish state (which of course "pushes" immigrants violently towards these borders).

I unequivocally condemn this policy which is being done voluntarily but also with the tolerance and pressure of the hypocritical European societies and states.

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

Η αλήθεια έχει δόντια

 Turkish Rapist:

"We have a responsibility to our history, as well as to our future. Because there is a Turkey that is bigger than Turkey. Let us not forget that there is a bigger country than our Turkey"
 "This is the reason why we cannot be trapped at our borders," said Mr. Tsavousoglou.
Think that there is a movement that accepted and is receiving help from the Turkish rapists, and then wonders about the suspicion it caused as a movement.
--
Γιώργο Μητραλιά καλά τα λες για την Ουκρανία, συμφωνώ μαζί σου, έχουμε την ίδια άποψη, αλλά ήρθε η ώρα να μιλήσεις και για την επιθετικότητα τής Τουρκίας. Μη ξεχνάς ότι ο ευρύτερος πολιτικός σου χώρος στην Ελλάδα το έχει κάνει τουμπεκί ψιλοκομμένο, από τότε που δεν είχες πρόβλημα μαζί του, και συκοφαντούσε όποιον είχε αντίρρηση ως εθνικιστή στα όρια τού φασισμού. Κάποια συγγνώμη κύριε Μητραλιά; Εκ μέρους όλων σας.
--
If you want the truth without teeth, you will have what I want (true, lie, moral, cynicism, all together) to I help the truth tear your flesh apart, because that is what those who want the truth without teeth deserve to receive.

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

Compagni, perché non capite?

 

 

Pasolini "is" closer to me than I ever imagined.

Today, literally today, I realize it again.

I am sure that if we had in our hands a more complete ''list'' of all his positions on Israel and Zionism, other more critic and more radical "anti-Zionist" positions would be revealed, forming a self-contradictory image of him.

But there is passion and contradiction on this issue on his part, this is rather indisputable.

 

 

 

Compagni, perché non capite?

di Pier Paolo Pasolini

 

[Sul numero di aprile 1967 di Nuovi argomenti Pier Paolo Pasolini pubblica le poesie su Israele che non aveva inserito nella raccolta di tre anni prima e una nota molto polemica nei confronti della sinistra che aveva prese una netta posizione contro Israele.

E’ un testo da rileggere]

 

Giuro sul Corano che io amo gli arabi quasi come mia madre.

Sono in trattative per comprare una casa in Marocco e andarmene là.

Nessuno dei miei amici comunisti lo farebbe, per un vecchio, ormai tradizionale e mai ammesso odio contro i sottoproletariati e le popolazioni povere.

Inoltre forse tutti i letterati italiani possono essere accusati di scarso interesse intellettuale per il Terzo Mondo: non io.

Infine, in questi versi, scritti nel ‘63, come è fin troppo facile vedere, sono concentrati tutti i motivi di critica a Israele di cui è ora piena la stampa comunista.

Ho vissuto dunque, nel ‘63, la situazione ebraica e quella giordana di qua e di là del confine. Nel Lago di Tiberiade e sulle rive del Mar Morto ho passato ore simili soltanto a quelle del ‘43, ‘44: ho capito, per mimesi, cos’è il terrore dell’essere massacrati in massa.

Così da dover ricacciare le lacrime in fondo al mio cuore troppo tenero alla vista di tanta gioventù, il cui destino appariva essere appunto solo il genocidio.

Ma ho capito anche, dopo qualche giorno ch’ero là, che gli israeliani non si erano affatto arresi a tale destino.

(E così, oltre ai miei vecchi versi, chiamo ora a testimone anche Carlo Levi, a cui la notte seguente l’inizio delle ostilità, ho detto che non c’era da temere per Israele, e che gli israeliani entro quindici-venti giorni sarebbero stati al Cairo).

È dunque da un misto di pietà e di disapprovazione, di identificazione e di dubbio, che sono nati quei versi del mio diario israeliana.

Ora, in questi giorni, leggendo l’Unità ho provato lo stesso dolore che si prova leggendo il più bugiardo giornale borghese.

Possibile che i comunisti abbiano potuto fare una scelta così netta? Non era questa finalmente, l’occasione giusta per loro di «scegliere con dubbio» che è la sola umana di tutte le scelte? Il lettore dell’Unità non ne sarebbe cresciuto? Non avrebbe finalmente pensato – ed è il minimo che potesse fare che nulla al mondo si può dividere in due? E che egli stesso è chiamato a decidere sulla propria opinione? E perché invece l’Unità ha condotto una vera e propria campagna per «creare» un’opinione? Forse perché Israele è uno Stato nato male? Ma quale Stato, ora libero e sovrano, non è nato male? E chi di noi, inoltre, potrebbe garantire agli Ebrei che in Occidente non ci sarà più alcun Hitler o che in America non ci saranno nuovi campi di concentramento per drogati, omosessuali e ebrei? O che gli ebrei potranno continuare a vivere in pace nei paesi arabi? Forse possono garantire questo il direttore dell’Unità, o Antonello Trombadori o qualsiasi altro intellettuale comunista?

E non è logico che, chi non può garantire questo, accetti, almeno in cuor suo, l’esperimento dello Stato d’Israele, riconoscendone a sovranità e la libere!?

E che aiuto si dà al mondo arabo fingendo di ignorare la sua volontà di distruggere Israele?

Cioè fingendo di ignorare la sua realtà?

Non sanno tutti che la realtà del mondo arabo, come la realtà della gran parte dei paesi in via di sviluppo – compresa in patte l’Italia – ha classi dirigenti, polizie, magistrature, indegne?

E non sanno tutti che, come bisogna distinguere la nazione israeliana dalla stupidità del sionismo, così bisogna distinguere i popoli arabi dall’irresponsabilità del loro fanatico nazionalismo?

L’unico modo per essere veramente amici dei popoli arabi in questo momento, non è forse aiutarli a capire la politica folle di Nasser, che non dico la storia, ma il più elementare senso comune, ha già giudicato e condannato?

O quella dei comunisti è una sete insaziabile di autolesionismo?

Un bisogno invincibile di perdersi, imboccando sempre la strada più ovvia e più disperata? Così che il vuoto che divide gli intellettuali marxisti dal partito comunista debba farsi sempre più incolmabile?»

 

da Nuovi Argomenti numero 6, aprile-giugno 1967

----

Πρόχειρη μετάφραση:

Comrades, why don't you understand?

by Pier Paolo Pasolini

[In the April 1967 issue of New Topics Pier Paolo Pasolini publishes the poems on Israel that he had not included in the collection three years earlier and a very controversial note against the left that had taken a clear stance against Israel.

It is a text to be reread].

---

I swear on the Koran that I love Arabs almost as I love my mother.

I am in talks to buy a house in Morocco and move there.

None of my communist friends would do it, for an old, now traditional, and non admited as open, hatred of underclass and poor populations.

Furthermore, perhaps all Italian writers can be accused of little intellectual interest in the Third World: not me.

Finally, in these verses, written in '63, as it is all too easy to see, all the reasons for criticizing Israel that are now full in the Communist press are concentrated.

Therefore, in 1963, I experienced the Jewish and Jordanian situation on both sides of the border. In the Sea of ​​Galilee and on the shores of the Dead Sea I spent hours similar only to those of '43, '44: I understood, by mimesis, what the terror of being massacred is.

So that I had to push back the tears in the depths of my too tender heart at the sight of so many young people, whose fate seemed to be just genocide.

But I also understood, after a few days that I was there, that the Israelis had by no means surrendered to this fate.

(And so, in addition to my old verses, I now also call Carlo Levi as a witness, to whom the night following the start of hostilities, I said that there was no fear for Israel, and that the Israelis within fifteen to twenty days would have been in Cairo).

It is therefore from a mixture of pity and disapproval, of identification and doubt, that those lines of my Israeli diary were born.

Now, these days, while reading the Unit, I felt the same pain that one feels when reading the most liar bourgeois newspaper.

Could it be that the Communists could have made such a clear choice? Wasn't this finally the right opportunity for them to "choose with doubt" that she is the only human of all choices? Wouldn't the Unity reader grow from it? He wouldn't have finally thought - and is it the least he could do that nothing in the world can be divided in two? And that he himself is called to decide on his own opinion? And why instead did the Unity conduct a real campaign to "create" an opinion? Could it be because Israel was a badly born state? But which state, now free and sovereign, was not born badly? And who among us, moreover, could guarantee the Jews that there will be no Hitler in the West or that in America there will be no new concentration camps for drug addicts, homosexuals and Jews? Or that Jews will be able to continue to live in peace in Arab countries? Perhaps the director of the Unit, or Antonello Trombadori or any other communist intellectual can guarantee this?

And it is not logical that, who cannot guarantee this, accept, at least in his heart, the experiment of the State of Israel, recognizing its sovereignty and freedom !?

And what help is being given to the Arab world by pretending to ignore its will to destroy Israel?

That is, pretending to ignore its reality?

Doesn't everyone know that the reality of the Arab world, like the reality of most of the developing countries - including Italy- has ruling classes, police, judiciary, unworthy?

And does not everyone know that, as we must distinguish the Israeli nation from the stupidity of Zionism, so we must distinguish the Arab peoples from the irresponsibility of their fanatical nationalism?

The only way to truly be friends with the Arab peoples at this moment, is not to help them understand Nasser's crazy politics, which I do not tell the story, but the most elementary common sense, has already judged and condemned?

Or is that of the Communists an insatiable thirst for self-harm?

An invincible need to get lost, always taking the most obvious and most desperate path? So that the void that divides the Marxist intellectuals from the Communist Party must become ever more unbridgeable? "

 

from Nuovi Argomenti number 6, April-June 1967

 

 

 

Πηγή:

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiMwvqEssT4AhXy_rsIHdW2B9wQFnoECAUQAQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.focusonisrael.org%2F2008%2F05%2F11%2Fpasolini-israele-1967%2F&usg=AOvVaw1kJoQeTyuiErjd-7GrQPSv

 

2Pac - Still Ballin’ (Nitty Remix) ft. Trick Daddy (Lyrics)

Under Pressure

You want me to believe such fairy tales?

 

Hypothetically, if there was a purely working class line, then the "tail" phenomena behind the "enemy of the enemy" would be eliminated.

You want me to believe such fairy tales?

The Latin American peoples and the Latin American working classes, plus their (left) vanguards, pay no one attention to their comrades in Ukraine, Iran and Kurdistan, despite the occasional conventionalist kindness and common ideological functions under the Sun of nothingness about praxis.

--

Do you want to live in a world where the unity of the workers has already existed, in even a potential minimal-initial form, I live in a world where the workers and petty bourgeoisie of the west and Latin America, with their vanguards, have betrayed the workers / petty bourgeois of Iran, have betrayed the workers / petty bourgeois of Kurdistan, have betrayed the workers / petty bourgeois of Ukraine, in order to have a convenient dirty alliance with their "enemy's enemy" (shamelessly or shyly).

The Iranians, the Kurds, the Ukrainian leftists have morals, they have values, they mean what they say, their internationalism is without "footnotes", but I am not, I can not be a good person, like them.

When my brother betrays me, I don't think of compassion for him, I think of taking revenge on him, of punishing him:

"eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth"

I betray the traitor, soul and body.

I once said to these traitors:

"You with Assad, you with Putin, you with Hezbollah, you with the Khomeini, I with the Yezidis, I with Israel.

Only then will you understand, and your ass will hurt ''.

Wrong, was a hetero-determinated reaction, but I don't regret, I don't ask for forgiveness from the traitors, I am just trying to find the real path for a real unity of workers.

--

Do you want us to play hide and seek for who "has" the most fascists in his ''house''?

No problem. 

However, I understand the reactions of the "everyday souls", I see what is happening in the popular bazaars of ideology and I don't determine my position from your statistics to show understanding in the hetero-determination of the oppressed, and to understand that they must somehow defend their home, even adopting ideologies and wearing costumes that are full of disgusting symbols and ugly colors.

Are Palestinians, for the most part, anti-Semitic Islamofascists?

Are all Ukrainians fascists?

No, but under the pressure of the enemy invasion, all the fermentations take place in the basements of the thoughts of everyday people.

In what world do you live?

On the one hand you incriminates the popular authoritarianism and the ideological temptations it carries with it, on the other hand when this authoritarianism appears with all its flags among the people, then, depending on the geopolitical camp you are in, you hide it as an image of the adopted ''family'' and you reveal it as an image of the enemies of those close to you.

Sorry, I don't play, I live in the bazaar and not in the bowl of intellect that has multiplied and is now a large percentage of social work, but the bowl does not leave it.

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

 

 

 

Τα ρωσολάγνα ακροδεξιά τέρατα στα Βαλκάνια, ξύπνησαν διψασμένα για αίμα.

Τα ρωσολάγνα ακροδεξιά τέρατα στα Βαλκάνια, ξύπνησαν διψασμένα για αίμα.

Θα τα υποδεχτεί η Λιάνα και ο Μπογιό, με πάθος για την συγκάλυψη τους πίσω από το ΝΑΤΟ..

Serb Chetnik gathering in Bosnia's Visegrad raises alarm

σκουπίδια

Ένα από τα εκατοντάδες παραδείγματα τής μπογιοπουλο-αυγερινο-σταλινοειδούς παραπληροφόρησης που κυριαρχεί στο ''αριστερό'' ελλάντα. 

Α, μη ξεχάσουμε και τον Αρούλη Χ. τον Μέγα. 

Ουστ, σκουπίδια.

Ο εικονιζόμενος άνδρας ΔΕΝ είναι Ουκρανός και μέλος του ...

The most important "bad cause" is patriarchy.

 

The state, the patriarchy and the class-exploitative division, were born at the same time and will die at the same time. 

I come to this conclusion, without of course saying anything original.

We are talking about three phenomena that simultaneously constitute a causal grid/nexus.

Let us not now consider the dialectical dimension of "productive forces-productive relations", let us put this dimension of the socio-historical being in a temporary parenthesis.

Which of the three structures-phenomena mentioned above is the most important as a cause, that is, this cause which gave birth to the others, without making them mere effects from it, but (making them) content forms of this most important cause?

The most important, "bad cause" is patriarchy.

Simplifying: the patriarchy gave birth to the state and the class exploitation.

--

 

If what I claim is true, that the deepest, most decisive and important cause for the emergence and existence of the causal grid/nexus "patriarchy / state / class exploitation" is patriarchy (also called death), then any compromise with patriarchy (and its disgusting crown, which is religion), even under the pretext that it is a superstructure of the other two elements of this causal grid/nexus, is a shameful compromise with class exploitation and the state, it is a betrayal of life.

--

 

Death to the patriarchy!

 

Ioannis Tzanakos Eriugena

 

 

Eminem - You Don't Know (Official Music Video) ft. 50 Cent, Cashis, Lloyd Banks

Μ * GΑ

 

We have been filled as a planet by MAGA, as follows:

Μ * GΑ

(make * greate again)

 

* At this point put every nation or ideology-religion.

Everyone wants to grow up again.

I want a hut in Syria, Iran or Kurdistan to listen  to music and poetry by enchanted villagers.

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος 

Russia's Barbarism in Ukraine Started in Syria. It Is Still Ongoing.

 

Russia's Barbarism in Ukraine Started in Syria. It Is Still Ongoing.  

By Tarek Kteleh
June 14, 2022

(Afraa Hashem via AP)

The mass graves and bombed-out cities targeted by Russian forces in Ukraine have shocked the civilized world, and rightly so. But to millions of Syrian war refugees, and Syrian-born Americans like myself, Vladimir Putin's barbaric assault on Ukraine is less a shock than it is a grim reminder of the overwhelming destructive forces he and his fellow dictator, Syria's Bashar Al-Assad, unleashed on our home country over a decade ago.

The West's response to Putin's murderous invasion of Ukraine has been swift, decisive, and unequivocal. Yet the ongoing Syrian crisis, which began in 2011 when protesters rose up against Assad's repressive government, is now, tragically, all but ignored. It's a mistake to see these two conflicts as separate. The failure of the United States and its allies to stand up to the Russian-backed Assad government years ago opened the door for Putin to wage all-out war against Ukraine. And unless Western leaders commit to helping Syria's opposition topple Assad and achieve the Syrian people's aspiration to transition to democracy, the world will remain needlessly vulnerable to the whims of dictators.

In the first years of Syria's civil war, opposition forces made steady progress, gaining control of large segments of several provinces, including Aleppo, Idlib, and Deraa. That all changed in 2015, when Putin came to the aid of Assad. What followed was one of the most horrific airstrike campaigns in history. Putin's forces didn't just bomb military targets -- they intentionally bombed schools, hospitals, and markets, killing 24,743 defenseless civilians, by one estimate, and leading to the world's largest refugee crisis since World War II.

All told, 6.6 million Syrians have fled their country since the beginning of the war, and an additional 6.7 million have been internally displaced.

My own brother, along with his wife and children, were forced to flee the Damascus suburb of Ghouta to avoid the bombings and a terrifying chemical attack that killed scores of their neighbors. They joined tens of thousands of Syrians who fled to overcrowded and unsanitary refugee camps in Idlib.

These joint Russian-Syrian assaults were critical in helping Assad stave off opposition forces and remain in power. But for Putin, they were a proving ground for tactics and technologies he would later deploy in Ukraine. Not only did the Syria campaigns allow Russia to test out new weapons systems and refine their disinformation techniques. They also offered Putin a sense of how the West might respond should he use these strategies in the future.

And it's here that the connection between these wars is most critical. Had the United States and other Western countries rallied behind Syria's opposition, and worked with allies in the Middle East to help rebel fighters beat back the Assad regime, it would have sent a strong message to Assad and Putin both. Specifically, it would have shown these dictators -- and others around the world -- that targeted assaults on helpless civilians won't be tolerated, no matter where they occur.

But no such response materialized. In fact, at no point has the United States ever provided enough support to the Syrian opposition to even remotely threaten Assad's power, much less Putin's. In effect, Putin was permitted to perpetrate horrific war crimes against the civilians of another nation with impunity. Is it any wonder he believed he could do the same in Ukraine?

Thankfully, the West has finally taken notice, showing solidarity with those fighting for their freedom in Ukraine, and demanding action from their leaders in the form of much-needed military support and economic sanctions. But an effective response to Putin's uncivilized behavior can't ignore his past and ongoing crimes against the Syrian people.

It's time for the West to make up for its failure in Syria, and finally provide my home nation's opposition forces with the support they need to beat back both Assad and Putin and achieve the Syrian people's desire to transition to democracy.

Dr. Tarek Kteleh is a practicing medical doctor, president of Rheumatology of Central Indiana, and a member of Citizens for a Secure and Safe America, a nongovernmental organization whose mission is to promote security in the Middle East and democratic progress in Syria. He is the author of The Six Pillars of Advocacy: Embrace Your Cause and Transform Lives. The views expressed are the author's own.

critique

I will try to critique in 1-2 points of the analyzes of the honest Marxist Michael Karadjis (When the work leave comes, in a few days or faster. I am an employee, not a professional intellectual, so show understanding for my simplistic and sometimes violent way of speaking).

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

 

 

"Neither Lebanon nor Gaza, think of the retirees" ..

Among the slogans of Iranian retirees:
"Neither Lebanon nor Gaza, think of the retirees" ..
This "reactionary" -by the left and Iranianleft criteria- slogan, drips like a poison in the "anti-Zionist" false consciousness of the (iranian and west) far left, freezes them, because they see where the Iranian people are going, and they do not like it. Let leftists be careful, but they are not careful, and so they will lose again.

--

Not only is Ukraine (as a nation and people) moving forever to detached from Eastern totalitarianism to join the West, but Iran (as a nation and people) is also moving in that direction.
The "west-east" divide may in fact be an alienative determination/definition, and may have to be overcome in the future, but at the moment eastern totalitarianism is the worst, first and foremost for the eastern peoples themselves who live within its chains.

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

2Pac - When We Ride on Our Enemies (Lyrics)

Neutral puppet but puppet of Putin.

Strange hypothesis of sociological and philosophical research, based on a strange socio-historical fact:

If we look at the attitude of the vast majority of the world leftism towards the Russian-Ukrainian war, we find that it was fully instrumentalized by Russian imperialism, certainly not in support of the Russian invasion (although there have been such cases) but by following a neutral line. 

If we think about this fact more carefully, we will understand that this is exactly what Russia from the leftism wanted [''Neutrality''], and that is what it succeeded. 

The Russian imperialists and their mechanisms are not naive, they tried and fully achieved the realistic goal they set in relation to the leftism, and the leftism did what Russian imperialists they wanted.

Therefore?

Neither the conspiracy theories about "secret" centers of power, which manipulate unsuspecting victims, apply, but nor the structuralist or Foucaultian notions (that dominate within the new left), that there are no centers of power and that everything is mainly structures. 

The proof that Foucaultian abstraction was not valid is the very attitude of the left, which along with most of anarchism became Putin's neutral puppet. 

Neutral puppet but puppet of Putin.

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος 

Avaze Mahali, Yare Mehraboon

 

With my poor knowledge of music, however, I can understand the multitude and complexity of the changes and rhythms in this Iranian folk song. Surely, however, I can understand why a stupid left-wing sectarian when he hears the word ''folk'', can not understand that this (Iranian) ''folk'', for example, can not be compared and paralleled with the ''folk'' that haunts him like a ghost and has led him to ideological spells, like those of the idiot-fool-idiots "autonomous Marxists" who grow in Germany like cabbages with which German-Marxist cabbage soups are made.