The abolition of private ownership of the means of production and material resources.

The abolition of private ownership of the means of production and material resources necessary for the reproduction of human life, although a necessary condition for the transition to a socialist social and economic system, does not in itself constitute the fulfillment of all the conditions for there to exist this system.

When the original socialists and communists set this negative condition, most of them talking about the abolition of private ownership of wealth primarily through the abolition of private ownership of the means of production, they defined the new system by a positive term: social-public ownership of the means of production .

This is a false and alienating definition if we are talking about real socialism.

Socialism, if it is real and not bureaucratic, by abolishing individual property does not replace it with another property, since the term property itself is intertwined with a form of individual or oligarchic rule of the distribution of the production process and its products.

Socialism will only come if it means in practice the complete replacement of all ownership and appropriation by the collective management and self-management of all social affairs, equality of pay, the weakening and even the abolition of hierarchical divisions in their practice and management.

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος 

Αντιστροφή (9)

When you refuse to equate the (less-than-worst-of) evil with the worse-than-that evil, this does not mean that you identify the lesser evil with something that is thereby the better of that which is worse than it.

The lesser evil is not necessarily defined as something "better".

And in this way, which if you pay attention to it is not so difficult to understand, I choose the Western and not the non-Western world, as it is currently constituted as a world.

There is also a more positive form of what I just said, but I ultimately prefer the negative pessimistic form of choosing between dominant structures, because as a thinking citizen I must think as coldly as possible about evil and vice versa, i.e. without idealization.

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος 

Pussy Riot — MAMA, DON’T WATCH TV / МАМА, НЕ СМОТРИ ТЕЛЕВИЗОР

Thoughts

 

Some, not a few—perhaps most of the followers of the great (always maleish) Ideas— whose minute hand is stuck to a certain time-moment, they think, so pitifully, that when the time (of history) passes from this moment of time, they are vindicated!

---

 

Stop at last with the "truth" that will be revealed when the masks fall.

All the ideologues, this is what they proclaim, that they will drop the masks, that the masks will fall.

Sorry to upset you, but such truth does not deserve to be called truth, whatever forcibly threw off a mask with such a declaration wanted to build an eternal mask, so says the famous (Hegelian or not) History.

Waiting to drop the enemy's mask, when that enemy can no longer keep it on his face, you put your own mask on him, duplicated.

In short, anyone who claims that the crimes of the Soviet Union in the Caucasus, in the Ukraine, in its southern Russian countryside, from the time of Lenin, not only after, have no connection with Soviet Communism, from its inception onwards, and incriminates only the tsarists, who were and are now being burdened as neo-tsarists with equally inhumane mass crimes, one thing is, a Liar. 

Also Liar is who is -certainly- the liar who acquits the mass murderer Bandera (the Poles, who are now friends of Ukraine, they know, and they don't give their dead who were exterminated en masse by this fascist, to the lie).

So let go of the great truths, and see the guilt that all these great YOUR ''truths'' carry.

---

 

To Iranian Friends.

Be careful, get rid of the theocratic regime, without the Shah sitting on your head (again), and put the term "capitalist" as many times as you want on this regime, before you crush it or after.

Do your Marxist rites, cast your anti-capitalist curses, curse the West too, lest you sin of the great sin of pro-imperialism, it will be a shame to be maligned by your left-wing comrades in the West, though they neither care nor have strong feelings about you, nor did they show any remarkable solidarity towards your struggle, while some liberals I know, even right-wing ones, care about, while for your comrades you exist as "tea and sympathy", still at least, because if you take the power with the blood and sacrifice of youngs of Iran, well, then, even Varoufakis will visit the new Iran.

--

 

When masculine men question themselves, they make sure to do so to the accompaniment of a raucous brass band while write their autobiography at the same time.

Their pain and the self-destruction of THEIR BIG, ALWAYS BIG IDEAS, which also disappointed them and brought them to the brink of the abyss, must they are proclaimed throughout the universe.

---

 

The very masculine men who even call themselves "male A", make big premarital promises, but not only that, they also make big premarital Ideologies that promise that they will solve, after the marriage takes place, all the problems.

--

 

Putin promised his deranged drunken People that he would conquer Ukraine in 3-4 days.

I wonder how is found a woman, to marry this worthless man.

Girls beware, they are in all ideological families.

--

 

Masculine men promise everything but do little or less than what they promise, women promise little and do almost everything.

--

 

The ideal situation is not to choose an internationalpolitical master, the ideal is to be independent, like the fantasy of every right-wing or left-wing maleman, but I am not persuaded by men, I am persuaded by whores with guns.

--

 

If the "world proletariat", more specifically the proletariat of the East, does not do the job, the evil one wicked rogue western imperialism, will.

What a fuck, that's life.

--

 

I am to favor the full armament of the Ukrainian army.

Give the Ukrainians the more modern weapons.

I am for the completion of the war with the total defeat of the Russians.

I'm not a pacifist.

The Russian empire of the whip should finally be dissolved, that China should enter its middle-to-down place in the relations of power until it is democratized, that the state unity of Turkey should be broken, the theocratic regime of Tehran should be destroyed.

--

 

When I hear that "masks must fall", I think that you are trying to put on the mask of eternal truth, to you stick to us eternally over our heads.

--

 

The "Light from the East" today is pro-Western, and hates the fascist propaganda and act of "multipolarity".

--

 

The emergence of non-Western imperialism-capitalism as a would-be new super-pole of global Dominance is perfectly symmetrical with the emergence of neo-fascism within the Western imperialist-capitalist world.

End of story.

--

 

Until capitalism and social inequality are abolished, the West must have the most Power and Dominance on the planet.

I don't make fun of myself, nor my friends, when I take a position in politics.

--

 

What a fuck!

I will immigrate to the USA, to make a point to idiot comrades, we vote for Democrats, without Marxist sophistry!!

In fact, by voting for the Democrats, we are simultaneously voting against each of their "left wing", voting for their most aggressive centrist wing that wants to oppose directly the extreme right in the West, China, Russia.

Simple as that, no more bullshit.

Postscript.

To the Democrats themselves I would say:

Throw the far-left morons out of the store!

--

 

If the purpose is "holy" the means of its realization will always be "dirty", oh clever Marxists!!!

--

 

I answer with clarity to forced dilemmas, I don't resort to sophistry to answer only in practice but not in my Speech.

I will not answer your sophistry, dear Michael, I don't need Marxism to make a strategic ideological policy and value decision.

The lives of everyday people would be better without forced and negative dilemmas, but if you see the world through the eyes of these people, you must answer clearly, also through your Speech.

I am simple, straightforward, clear and honest with you.

If presented with a dilemma that must be answered, between imperialist West and imperialist East, I openly choose imperialist West.

The conclusion of a lifetime, along with other conclusions.

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

 

 

 

 

 

Αντιστροφή (8). Finally stop use Hegel's name, at least do this.

There are those who define themselves as "dialectical" Judges of values, but usually they do not hold the balance correctly, they tilt it.

They judge, for example, the values proclaimed by the "West", that if they have meaning, they only have meaning in reference to the specific material-social (therefore also ideological) conditions.

So, for these silly and dangerous anti-democratic sophists, these values (democracy, freedom, equality, secularism, etc.) before they are even corrupted by class capitalist use are already weak, "abstract" as they say.

But when they refer to the value, their own value, of anti-imperialism or even anti-capitalism, then they see this value as already strong in its beginning, before it undergoes the alterations of its time-to-time alterationmakers, such as the -according to their words- "opportunists" "nationalists pseudo-anti-imperialists" "campists" and other various alterers of an initially already non-alienated Idea that only after its "bad use" is altered and alienated.

You See?

Their own values are afflicted by hypocrites and alienators, although originally pure, while the values of the accursed West are weak, half-alienated from their initial inception, before they are abused by hypocrites, etc.

I caught you a Marxist/anarchist, you are a professional Liar.

Finally stop use Hegel's name, at least do this.

Hegel was the hero of the defense of abstraction.

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος 

 

 

Αντιστροφή (7). The time has come to destroy both metaphysics..

The radical theorists of modernity demolished the Transcendentalism of Transcendent through a transcendentalized Immanence.

The time has come to destroy both metaphysics, that means to demolishe metaphysics of the Transcendentalism/Transcendent and also the metaphysics of the transcendentalized Immanence.

 Ιωάννης Τζανάκος

Αντιστροφή (6). Transcendentalism..

All the highest "holy" purposes fall into "dirty" means of their realization.

At least the Jesuits were telling half the truth, and don't tell me that as the Greek proverb says, "Half the truth is the biggest lie", because this is sometimes true and sometimes not true.

The Jesuits were telling a half-truth when they claimed that a holy purpose can sanctify the means of its realization (which may, therefore, be dishonorables), because they were telling the basic lie that there are "holy purposes".

You adventurers of modern revolutionism are of course not telling the whole truth, that is to say that there are NO "holy purposes" but only human-social purposes, and you are not telling this truth, i.e. you are lying, because you are concealing the production by you of yours "purpose'' as '''holy''.

You verbally disguise, by hiding it, the designation ''holy'' in ''purpose'' with various transcendental equivalents which nevertheless mean the same as the designation ''holy''.

Like the feudal-capitalist revolution of the partisan bureaucrats, it took the institution of "minister" and christened it (at first) "Commissar".

It was the same, but the adventurous revolutionaries of modernity changed its name!

Thus the "holy purpose" changed its name and received many other names that meant "holy", the Supreme, therefore the Transcendent.

This is not just a repetition of a "half-lie" that can be "half-truth", but it is an all-round complete spherical and brazen Lie, already in the "half" of the sentence born by the Jesuits (so their more complex sentences were 'translated').

Let's go now to the other "half" of the sentence:

The Jesuits speak of legitimate "dishonorable means" to realize the "holy end", so they accept that they approve of the use of some "dishonorable means" as long as they serve to realize a "holy end".

Do the modern super-revolutionaries accept that the "dishonorable means" they will use are really "dishonorable"?

I have seen neither in Trotsky's essay nor in Lukács' statements, an honest acceptance that "dishonorable means" are accepted for the realization of their "holy purpose", which, as we said, is not called "holy'' but through other names that hidden their transcendentalism.

As for the anarchists, things are simple, and they have one name: Netzaev.

They are open in their declarations that they will use all means, not really caring to even define them as "dishonest" or "honest".

And their own "holy goal", the destruction of the state, is also not defined by them as "holy", since the modern religion of anarchism throws into the "fire of hell" any transcendentalism, whether it has the name of the "state" or it has the name of "god" ("Neither God, nor State", they say).

But why is transcendence/transcendentalism considered by them to exist only in the (term and alienation) "God" and in the (term and alienation) "State"?

Did they "forget" something? But of course, they also "forgot" themselves, their "pure, always self-determined" and rather monstrously huge Ego.

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος