There are those who define themselves as "dialectical" Judges of values, but usually they do not hold the balance correctly, they tilt it.
They judge, for example, the values proclaimed by the "West", that if they have meaning, they only have meaning in reference to the specific material-social (therefore also ideological) conditions.
So, for these silly and dangerous anti-democratic sophists, these values (democracy, freedom, equality, secularism, etc.) before they are even corrupted by class capitalist use are already weak, "abstract" as they say.
But when they refer to the value, their own value, of anti-imperialism or even anti-capitalism, then they see this value as already strong in its beginning, before it undergoes the alterations of its time-to-time alterationmakers, such as the -according to their words- "opportunists" "nationalists pseudo-anti-imperialists" "campists" and other various alterers of an initially already non-alienated Idea that only after its "bad use" is altered and alienated.
You See?
Their own values are afflicted by hypocrites and alienators, although originally pure, while the values of the accursed West are weak, half-alienated from their initial inception, before they are abused by hypocrites, etc.
I caught you a Marxist/anarchist, you are a professional Liar.
Finally stop use Hegel's name, at least do this.
Hegel was the hero of the defense of abstraction.
Ιωάννης Τζανάκος
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου