Left-wing
nationalism in non-Western countries, even when it occurs in ethnic
minorities, is like the deepest peel of an onion.
Beneath the external
Marxist-Leninist and other internationalist shells appears this deeper
shell, the left-wing nationalist core.
Being in the middle between
internationalist's communists and left nationalists, I have to say that
calm and truth are needed in these disputes that occur in movements that
have both tendencies but it seems to them that the internationalist
tendency prevails. Internationalists must understand that left-wing
nationalism or ethnocentrism is on fire like a blazing fire and must not
artificially extinguish it. Better to be separated from the beginning
and to have a kind of moderate rivalry but also alienation from the
beginning.
I consider myself, without being competent and an expert on
the issues of the Iranian left, that the split of the communist Komala
led by Alizadeh is a left-wing nationalist split, which will move
between anti-capitalist left and left nationalism without joining the
tendency Mehtadi.
The internationalist's who are protesting against
Alizadeh's attitude today are right to protest, in my opinion, and I
like them, but on the other hand they are behaving like the cheating
husband.
The movement in the Kurds can not but tend to
nationalism-ethnocentrism, this is to be expected, but the Hekmatists
knew it from the beginning, trying from the beginning to set up their
movement mainly in this area despite the fact that it is a iranian
communist movement-party.
So why are they surprised if left-wing
nationalism is mushrooming everywhere in Kurdistan? even to people who
stood with them in past conflicts with other versions of left-wing
nationalism?
They acted sectarian as super-internationalists, and now
they will reap the fruits of their ideological one-sidedness.
I like
them more but they are also sectarian.
Ιωάννης Τζανάκος
I see an analogy between the factional events in Iranian Kurdistan and what happened in Turkish Kurdistan, where the Turkish and Kurdish communists, there Maoists under the ideological configuration of İbrahim Kaypakkaya,, although they recognized the national existence Kurds -, remained in a hard anti-nationalist line of ideological integration that gave birth to the PKK as a reaction. The ideological anti-nationalist arrogance of sectarian communism or vice versa of bourgeois cosmopolitanism breeds, especially in minorities, nationalist reactions.
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήAs I have stated, I believe that the imperialist scenarios for the dissolution of the unified sovereignty of Iran are reactionary and destructive for the working class and for the Persian popular majority and for the national-ethnic minorities. But my question is: how are the left-wing communist forces in Iran working in the opposite direction? Sacred communist scriptures are not always enough. The very questioning of the timeless, even pre-capitalist, weight of ethnic and national determination by internationalist Marxist arrogance does not lead to correct reflections on such problems.
Απευθυνόμενος προς τους Ιρανούς σεκταριστές αριστερούς και κομμουνιστές (στο φατσοβιβλίο):
ΔιαγραφήYour comrades in the West will tell you: ok, no problem, if you are fighting against capitalism, the state and sovereignty, dismantle the sovereign unity of Iran. I'm not like your western comrades, I'm not a neo - left idiot, and I do not want to play as a child with foreign countries and foreign peoples. I do not want to flatter my Western super-revolutionary narcissism, and so I ask: what will you do with Iran's national sovereignty? What will you do not only with the rights but with the emerging national consciousness of the Kurds? will you just "integrate" it through Marxist-Leninist or other sectarian doctrines? If you want to ask the wise philosophers and thinkers of the new left in the west, they will tell you to dismantle all as long as you achieve the anti-capitalist anti-state goal. If you want keep listening to the western narcissists of the super-revolution. I have severed my ties with them. I am interested in everyday people