Left-wing
nationalism in non-Western countries, even when it occurs in ethnic
minorities, is like the deepest peel of an onion.
Beneath the external
Marxist-Leninist and other internationalist shells appears this deeper
shell, the left-wing nationalist core.
Being in the middle between
internationalist's communists and left nationalists, I have to say that
calm and truth are needed in these disputes that occur in movements that
have both tendencies but it seems to them that the internationalist
tendency prevails. Internationalists must understand that left-wing
nationalism or ethnocentrism is on fire like a blazing fire and must not
artificially extinguish it. Better to be separated from the beginning
and to have a kind of moderate rivalry but also alienation from the
beginning.
I consider myself, without being competent and an expert on
the issues of the Iranian left, that the split of the communist Komala
led by Alizadeh is a left-wing nationalist split, which will move
between anti-capitalist left and left nationalism without joining the
tendency Mehtadi.
The internationalist's who are protesting against
Alizadeh's attitude today are right to protest, in my opinion, and I
like them, but on the other hand they are behaving like the cheating
husband.
The movement in the Kurds can not but tend to
nationalism-ethnocentrism, this is to be expected, but the Hekmatists
knew it from the beginning, trying from the beginning to set up their
movement mainly in this area despite the fact that it is a iranian
communist movement-party.
So why are they surprised if left-wing
nationalism is mushrooming everywhere in Kurdistan? even to people who
stood with them in past conflicts with other versions of left-wing
nationalism?
They acted sectarian as super-internationalists, and now
they will reap the fruits of their ideological one-sidedness.
I like
them more but they are also sectarian.
Ιωάννης Τζανάκος
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου