The wretchedness of the anti-imperialists and anti-westernists. Multiple proof fields. Η αθλιότητα των αντιιμπεριαλιστών και αντιδυτικιστών. Πολλά πεδία απόδειξης.

I can no longer weep, my heart has been assimilated into the mind of an expert who has no other specialty than to seek out and punish guilty rulers and the moralists (they are not always the same persons).

--

 

Όπως λέει ο φίλος Ανδρέας Οικονομόπουλος: «..Και δεν είναι δυνατόν να παρακολουθούμε πολιτικούς να ισχυρίζονται ''Στις σκέψεις μας υπάρχει ένα μεγάλο Γιατί''. Όλοι τους γνωρίζουν το Γιατί...»

Πως να το πεις αυτό, πως να το προσδιορίσεις;

Να το επεκτείνουμε μποεσικά;

Everyone knows, but did we also?

Όχι, φίλοι (δεν εννοώ τον Ανδρέα).

Ο Μποεσί τελείωσε, ως δικαιολογία.

I knew, I shouted, but no one heard me (for similar things).

Let's measure ourselves in the empty mirror of responsibility, all of us, but in addition to strangers who shouted, the labor union also spoke, and for the paradoxical reason of History, what revenge, also the ''evil imperialist west'', through the ''satanic European union''.

But this thing (EU) that it spoke and threatened the crinminals, what exactly does it have to do with these Greek feudal-bourgeois lords crinminals?

 

---- 

Το ΚΚΕ έβγαλε οργισμένη ανακοίνωση εναντίον αυτών που θέλουν να αθωώσουν, λέει, την Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση που υποχρεώνει σε ιδιωτικοποίησεις κ.λπ., για το έγκλημα στα Τέμπη.

Μα φυσικά, πως τολμάνε να αμφισβητούν οι πράκτορες τού καπιταλισμού, δυτικού ιμπεριαλισμού κ.ο.κ τον αμετάβλητο κανόνα εξήγησης όλων των αιτίων των προβλημάτων τής χώρας και τής εργατικής τάξης εντός της, που προωθείται από το ΚΚΕ από τότε που υπάρχει αυτό το κόμμα τού Θεού;

Το ΚΚΕ δεν λέει τίποτα για την ταμπακιέρα, για το συγκεκριμένο είδος των απαιτήσεων που θέτει η Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση, όσον αφορά την αναβάθμιση των υπηρεσιών των σιδηροδρόμων κ.λπ, αλλά τονίζει μόνον το ζήτημα των ιδιωτικοποιήσεων και των προβλημάτων που αυτές δημιουργούν στην διαχείριση των στρατηγικών υποδομών, στην οικονομική κατάσταση των λαϊκών στρωμάτων κ.ο.κ.

Προσοχή όμως, δεν αποκλείεται ένα μέρος τής αλήθειας να εκφράζεται σε αυτό που λέει το ΚΚΕ. 

Το πρόβλημα με αυτή την σέκτα (δεν είναι η μοναδική, είναι η πιο σκληρή ως μεταφυσική πίστη) είναι το πώς μετατρέπει μια πιθανή μισή αλήθεια σε όπλο για την συγκάλυψη τής ολότητας τής αλήθειας, η οποία ως ολότητα περιέχει κι άλλες πτυχές.

Μια από αυτές τις πτυχές θα ήταν η εξέταση τής πιθανής ειδικότερης ευθύνης τής Ελληνικής μπουρζουαζίας ακόμα και εντός των νεοφιλελεύθερων πλαισίων που θέτει (κι εγώ επίσης λέω κακώς) η Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση.

Βλέπουμε λοιπόν τι κρύβει ο σοφιστικός λόγος αυτών των ιδεολογικών ομάδων.

Κρύβει πολλά, υπόγεια και σκοτεινά ταξικά καπιταλιστικά ίσως, αλλά σίγουρα γραφειοκρατικά συμφέροντα, όπως επίσης και άλλα, γεωπολιτικά συμφέροντα.

--

 

Το εξής ιρανογενές ερώτημα «μου».

Ως υστερικό ερώτημα φοβικού περιφερειακού υποκειμένου.

Η κακιά δύση παρεμβαίνει υπόπτως στις υποθέσεις των καταπιεστών μας, γιατί το κάνει; δεν θέλουμε τέτοιες παρεμβάσεις, αλλά ω κακιά δύση, γιατί δεν παρεμβαίνεις στις υποθέσεις των καταπιεστών μας; μήπως έχεις κρυφές σχέσεις μαζί τους; ύποπτο αυτό, όπως ύποπτο και το ότι δεν παρεμβαίνεις αλλά επίσης ύποπτο ότι παρεμβαίνεις.

Κάπου οι διεφθαρμένες περιφέρειες των μεγάλων δυνάμεων που τις κυριαρχούν ή είναι δυνάμει κυριαρχούσες επί αυτών των διεφθαρμένων περιφερειών (όντας και οι ίδιες -οι μεγάλες δυνάμεις- διεφθαρμένες, αλλά όχι σε κάποια στοιχειώδη), κάπου λοιπόν αυτές οι περιφέρειες έχουν χάσει τον μπούσουλα τής αυτοεννόησης τους, και αρχίζουν να φαίνονται, σε μένα τουλάχιστον, περισσότερο προβληματικές ως προς την εσωτερικότερη ισχύ τού αποικιοκρατικού καρκινώματος. Ποιος σκέφτεται περισσότερο αποικιακά λοιπόν; και εν πάση περιπτώσει, άσχετα από αυτόν τον προσδιορισμό, τι άλλο θέλουμε να κάνουμε, πέραν των επιπλήξεων τού πατριαρχικού προστατευτικού μητροπολιτικού κέντρου, εκτός από το να ζητάμε κάτι το οποίο δεν το ζητάμε αλλά το ζητάμε μη ζητώντας το; Αν δεν ήμουν πεισμένος ότι η Ε.Ε είναι επίσης μια σφηκοφωλιά διαπλοκών και διαφθοράς, μαζί με όλα τα άλλα, και την φανταζόμουνα λίγο πειραματικά λίγο καλοπροαίρετα, ως κάτι το τρόπον τινά και-αγαθόν, τότε θα έλεγα χωρίς δισταγμό, ότι τους έχουμε τρελάνει τούς τύπους, ημείς οι Έλληνες, Ιρανοί, από την Παταγονία; που να ξέρω.

--

 

2 Μαρτίου 2022  ·

I am not exaggerating!!

Enter in all the western left sites that have the ability to commentary:

EVERYWHERE there is a mass (50%) of Gray-red pro-Trump pro-Russian mass!! 

 

Although their consumption of vodka is excessive, the Russian imperialists have quite a clever, deceitful, dark mind. Otherwise, how would they know to play with the "logic" of the neutralizing "Finnishness" of Europe?

This "pacifist" logic, transmitted by all Russian propaganda mechanisms and having as its "little sister" a similar Turkish version (as "logic"), has influenced the European far right as well as the European radical left. The general truth of disarmament and radical anti-NATOism is thus turning into a corrosive poison poured out by the Eurasianists to dismantle Europe and make it hostage to the geopolitical and biopolitical manipulations of the Russian-Chinese masters of this hostage, in exchange for a misleading period of ''peace".

Someone will say, and what do you suggest? NATO reinforcement and a full return of the United States to Europe?

Whether this is suggested by one or the other, it has already been done.

But if you want the honest answer I say this:

Until there is a revolution in the "east", from Iran to Moscow, the demand for the abolition of NATO today leads to the domination of the new eastern imperialist axis, which I do not think will help the left anywhere.

For NATO to cease to exist, must first be revolutionaryly destroyed the Moscow zombies and the Iranian theocrats and replaced by workers' or bourgeois democratic-radical forces.

In order to liberate Europe from its bourgeois imperialist "self, must first be destroyed the reactionary zombies of the distorted "east", not the other way around.  

--

 

Τα διπλά κριτήρια των δυνατών, τα διπλά κριτήρια των αδύναμων και τα διπλά κριτήρια των μεσολαβητών.

--

 

99% of the "Marxists'" arguments for the war of the Russian imperialists show sensitivity to the damage of the Russian "living space". We have to seen such pro-Nazi sensitivity and equal distance since from the interwar period.

My congratulations to the ideological descendants and believers of Marx! They are the most sensitive pacifists and slimy apologists of Lebensraum's theory. I'm sure 99% of these idiots don't know it, and that makes them even more outrageously stupid. 

--

 

2 Μαρτίου 2022  ·

Lavrov called for the transformation of Europe into a neutral zone without American nuclear weapons, because he is a dove of peace and a man of Christian love.

Russia, the country that has the most nuclear weapons of any country in the world, is calling for the US to leave Europe, but essentially calling for the complete disarmament of Europe and its submission to the military totalitarian mechanism of Russia, the whip empire and of extreme militarism.

Russia, consistent with its "historic goal", is calling for the return of humanity to the barbarity of ever-changing borders, it is essentially calling for the abolition of the principle of maintaining the existing borders of nation-states, not because neo-tsarist criminals have an internationalism in mind but because they want to overturn the postwar principle of the permanence of existing borders.

The Russian militarists do not just want to change the borders of their own nation-state, for its own benefit of course, but to turn this revisionist tendency of their state into a permanent principle of international politics, which is why the Russian imperialists today are worse by the Western and American imperialists, because they do not just want to legitimize the change of borders in favor of more powerful powers, but because they want to make the annexation of territories a permanent Principle of a new military-militaristic barbarism of world society.

I explain it comparatively:

Western (US, etc.) imperialists, when they intervene, destroy, bring doom, but at some point leave, do not seek the annexation of territories or the establishment of the principle of "annexation-integration" of territories, while the Russian imperialists now they want to annex territories and to make again this archaic and pre-modern/proto-modern principle permanent Principle of state dynamics.

Neo-Eastern Russian militaristic imperialism wants to bring the world back to mass bloodbaths, annexations and territorial empires, and in this it finds ideological allies in Turkey and China.

--

 

I did not say that but it is waiting for an answer: "The east does not have double criteria, it only persecutes us."

--

 

I will tell you what a not-so-close friend of mine said to a protesting eastern his friend about the double standards of the West.

I disagree with this friend of mine, and I consider his thinking biased, but I will convey what he said to his friend from the east (I convey in summary form)

''The Russians have targeted the Greek/Greek-speaking community in Ukraine that has existed since the 8th century BC and now they want to expel the last Greeks of the east.

Beyond that, I do not care at all if the easterners feel wronged that the westerners treat them with double criteria. A western people who lived in the "eastern" lands is constantly expelled until the last man. The west has double criteria and you "easterners" have one criterion: western people to living in the east? no, you can not stand it. The Jews, who were a westernized people of the East, and now live in the East, live with the help of their weapons alone.

Not in the hypocrisy and in the violent social culture of the east. The east does not have double criteria, it only persecutes us.

We are biased and so are you...''

I explained to my friend that Russia is not east, and he told me that Russia is not west but east. The discussion continues, somewhat difficult.  

--

 

Η άποψη ότι ο πόλεμος αυτός είναι εμφύλιος πόλεμος με την εθνοτική έννοια είναι η φασιστική ρατσιστική αντίληψη των Ρώσων φασιστών. Το λέω γιατί άκουσα τα υποκριτικά δάκρυα μιας συγκινημένης Ρωσίδας ηθοποιού που ζει στην Ελλάδα. Έκλαιγε συγκινημένη και έλεγε αυτό που λέει ο Πούτιν και αυτό που έλεγαν οι ναζί όταν μίλαγαν για την Αυστρία. Και οι ηλίθιοι Έλληνες συγκινούνται. Εγώ κλάνω.

--

 

I'm bored of cyber wars, I'm not even interested.

Facts.

No one from the Greek left made a demonstration for the dead in the 2019 uprising in Iran, or even before in Iraq.

On the contrary, there was a "anti-imperialist" demonstration in Athens in honor of Soleimani when he was killed by the Americans and the Israelis.

He was honored along the way as a hero.

Everything else is just talks.

--

 

Απολογία; Ίσως. Έκανα αυτά που έμαθα, πολεμώντας με ό,τι είχα μέχρι το Όχι-Ναι τού 2015. Την επόμενη μέρα από εκείνη την νύχτα που το παιδί έβγαλε έρπη και μας πούλησε στο παζάρι, κανονικότατα, δεν περιορίστηκα στην «αριστερή» κριτική «εκ των αριστερών», γενικεύοντας φαράκλεια όπως γενίκευσε ο αναφερόμενος σε μια βδομάδα μέσα, στην Αυγή, αλλά γενίκευσα καθολικά, δηλαδή γενίκευσα.

Ή γενικεύεις ή δεν γενικεύεις. Και σε αυτή την γενίκευση δεν φτάνει μια ενδοοικογενειακή κριτική, συγκαταβατική και φιλική, όπως κάνανε όλοι οι οργισμένοι που θόλωσαν την κριτική τους και την «γενίκευσή» τους καταφεύγοντας στο «άδυτο των αδύτων», το αριστερό άφατο και ιερό, που τάχα βεβήλωσε ο ρεφορμιστής, που τού κάνουμε όμως έτσι σκόντο, καταφεύγοντας στο ιερό μεν αλλά απωθώντας τον απλά στον περίβολο ή στα όρια του.

Απλά: ή αυτός ο αλήτης είναι αριστερός ή εγώ.

Αν η άλλη αριστερά συνεχίζει να τον θεωρεί αριστερό, έστω φθαρμένο, τότε δεν εγώ δεν είμαι αριστερός. Έτσι γενικεύεις, όχι μαλακιούλες. Μην ακούσω ότι «προσωποποιώ». Καταλαβαινόμαστε άρα συντομεύουμε τον λόγο μας.

Ας πάρουν λοιπόν το Όνομα, κι ας κάνουν ό,τι θέλουν.

Οι υπόλοιποι, όσοι γενικεύουν τις εμπειρίες τους, απλά θα διευρύνουμε όσα χάσματα μπορούν να διευρυνθούν.

Μα γιατί;

Μα γιατί έτσι μάθαμε.

Καμία απορία;

--

 

Who did the hydrocephalus Sartre recognize as the good radical intellectual from Iran? Ali Shariati. 

I consider him a great, reactionary, intellectual, and good man, but if I were Sartre I would not recognize him as the face of radical Iran. But no one from a peripheral country could be a hydrocephalus intellectual like Sartre. Sartre also wanted to define who the intellectual foam of a non-Western nation is. This is the imperial leftist mindset of the West, from Hegel and Marx to Sartre.

--

 

Ο Θεοδίκης μετατέθηκε δυσμενώς σε επαρχιακό πταισματοδικείο, και εκστομίζει κατάρες ανείπωτες και γελοίες. Θα πέσει μέσα σε όλες του τις προβλέψεις, και οι κατάρες του θα πιάσουν.

Πρέπει να το πω άραγε ότι κάνω πλάκα;

Θα έπρεπε κανονικά να βάλω «εισαγωγικά».

--

 

Μιλώντας για αξιολογική ουδετερότητα δεν σημαίνει ότι την εννοείς όπως ο Μαξ Βέμπερ. Σίγουρα πρέπει να τελέσεις κάποιαν ερμηνεία αυτού του όρου που σχηματίστηκε ως όρος από τον Μαξ Βέμπερ, ακόμα κι αν αυτό θα το κάνεις μόνο και μόνο για να διαχωρίσεις την σημασία τού όρου αυτού όπως τον εννοείς εσύ από την σημασία που έχει στην θεώρηση τού Μαξ Βέμπερ.

--

 

You can be free without wanting to. At the beginning, please be accepted again in the "House" that expelled you, but you are not accepted and in fact this "House" is right in this decision because as "House" it defines who and what belongs to its "inside", it decides of what are its limits.

Do the lesson at last dude.

The "Houses" constantly declare that their boundaries are "sacred" and "eternal", but in reality they change them as they deserve, cynically, in order to always maintain their cohesion.

And their deepest "purpose" is always a pretext, an ideological ghost, an indefinable general purpose, as indefinable as the greater the "need" of the "House" to use it as it pleases in shaping its external boundaries. 

--

 

A strategic defeat does not usually lead to rational reasonings.
I unreservedly support those losers who fought for a just cause, but I will tell them this: sometimes their stupidity and their vengeful evilness lead them straight to utter nonsense.
Whoever wants to hear flattery to address priests, here we speak the harsh language of truth.

--

 

We have been filled as a planet by MAGA, as follows:

Μ * GΑ

(make * greate again)

* At this point put every nation or ideology-religion.

Everyone wants to grow up again.

I want a hut in Syria, Iran or Kurdistan to listen to music and poetry by enchanted villagers.

--

 

"Truth" (a form of truth) can be the courageous realization that a hypothesis-case, a social strategy, has turned into a pile of rubble, and the way to reconstitute it into a single and coherent "edifice" does not have to be (as a way) artificial, rough, easy, yielding immediate solution of the ''problem-ruiness'' of the "case".

In this sense, truth can means an ''map'' of a moral and analytical catastrophe that must be overcome but not with false ease...

--

 

The heirs and descendants of "immaterial goods" usually don't know what these goods consist of.

They claim them with notarial deeds, they declare everywhere that they are "isms" that rightfully belong to them, they wave flags and symbols, they say that the deceased whispered in their ear that he has them as "successors".

--

 

Marxism, or Marxism-Leninism.
Res nullius.
Ferae naturae.
Res derelictae.

 

--

 

There is no "Lenin" and "Leninism" in reality without the "sealed train".

--

 

Weapons from everywhere.
Lenin, who I never liked, but knew what "politics" meant, would agree.

--

 

In Greece, fascism has a specific "face":

1. Part of the orthodox Christian church, which the Russians have "won" with rubles and promises of "local" "Christian" fascist power.

2. Stalinist nostalgic Russophiles or "moderately" critics of Russian imperialism (KKE and others, even within Tsipras's party, Syriza).

The Russian-funded pro-Russian and pro-Assad neo-Nazis of the "golden dawn" and the "Greek solution" (pro-Russian nationalist party represented in the Greek parliament).

4. Department of the Greek secret services.

5. Greek and Greek-Russian capitalists directly connected with the Kremlin.

---------

 

Hekmatists: the new Tudeh.

-

I reconsider the slogan: "stop the imperialist-capitalist war" and I wonder: How? When an occupying army has occupied a country and wants to impose its power on this country through massacres, rapes, terrorism, what does it mean to speak against capitalism-imperialism in general if you don't speak against the occupation, and if you don't act against it?

It means that you are a "Marxist" of an abstract, metaphysical and rather politically absurd type - at best, or that you are in favor of the occupying power in the sense that you underestimate the practical significance of what it means a occupation against a country.

And the "Marxist" will say: and what is a country? and what is territory? and what does this mean on the part of the workers who should not be attached to a country?

A general Marxist truth, a political-philosophical a priori, but without its synthetic critical adaptation and application.

This "Marxism" is the "ideal" ideological victim of nationalism, the ''ideal'' falsh-opponent of chauvinism, when issues such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine arise.

It is "Marxism" that remained attached to human revolutionary history before the outbreak of World War II, where emerged the timeless need to participate in a national democratic defense of a country when there is indeed an attack on that country by part of a totalitarian fascist state, regardless of whether this country is "burdened" with capitalist or imperialist "sins" and "attributes" (I speak a "religious language" because this corresponds to the theological meaning of Marxism from the point of view of the sectarian "Marxists").

The issue is not about the "Leninist" or purely sectarian-extreme leftist "foundation" of this corrupt theological defeatism, but its political effect.

These people are either the "useful idiots" of the emerging Eastern capitalism-imperialism or just their direct allies, and unfortunately they are also suffering from amnesia for their own ills.

When, for example, the strongest tendency of the Iranian communists, the Hekmatists, has structured its ideological and political "self" as overcoming the nationalism-populism of the Tudeh Stalinists, but in this case it is doing the same "anti-Western-anti-imperialist" wrong, you think how futile ideological conflicts and differences can be if the end political result is the same: a non-Stalinist non-populist workers' council-Tudeh always remains a Tudeh. Wrong again.

--

 

Revolutionary Marxist or anarchist tendencies can also be lined up behind neither-nor "logic" (neither NATO nor Putin), but the "mainstream" that manifests this "logic" is:

1) neo-Stalinist "Nostalgic" tails of the eastern imperialisms that through their neutral political positions kept a hypocritical "critical" distance from the two "poles" but in essence prefer the emerging new capitalist-imperialist "eastern" pole.

2) Defeatist reformist leftists (such as a large part of the left-wing Democrats in the United States, or the populist section of the British Labor Party under Corbyn, etc., and various neo-Trotskyist currents within the left-wing ideological opposition) transform their once milde farleft tendecies into extreme post-colonial sectarianism.

3) Extreme neo-left post-colonial anti-colonialists, who, although not dogmatic Marxists, have retreated into a form of reactionary anti-Westernism and cultural relativism...

--

 

The KKE (Stalinist Communist Party of Greece) recognized the partition of Ukraine in 2014 by sending a delegation to observe the fraudulent elections in Luhansk and Donetsk, as well as in the illegal referendum on Crimea.

In Rizospastis 15/3/2014, on the eve of the pseudo-referendum on Crimea, the "Announcement of the Press Office of the Central Committee on the developments in Ukraine and the referendum in Crimea" is published:

''Press release of the JC Press Office on the developments in Ukraine and the referendum in Crimea

In detail, the announcement of the Press Office of the JV is as follows:

"The KKE, from the very beginning, condemned the US-NATO-EU imperialist intervention in Ukraine and the coup d'état of the government by reactionary forces, with the participation of the Nazis, which poses great dangers to the Ukrainian people. The attitude of these forces and their criticism of the developments in Ukraine and the referendum in Crimea are a monument to hypocrisy. After all, they are the same forces that led the partition of Yugoslavia, the detachment of Kosovo, the imperialist interventions in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, the organization of coups against governments that they did not like. They did the same in Syria and now in Ukraine.

In the interest of the peoples, we consider that the integration of Crimea into Russia will neither effectively address this intervention, nor will it actually solve any of the real problems of the Crimean people, nor will it mean any real normalization of the situation or a long-term peace solution; cooperation for the peoples of the region with prosperity and progress. In both Russia and Ukraine, the majority of the people are suffering, living in conditions of capitalist barbarism brought about by the 1991 counter-revolutionary upheavals.

We understand that the people of Crimea, who are largely of Russian and Tatar descent, are concerned about the seizure of government power by nationalist and fascist forces, who in one of their first actions turned against minorities and communists, repealing the law on the "regional languages" and destroying anti-fascist monuments. However, the withdrawal of Crimea from Ukraine and its integration into Russia will not solve the problem of changing the balance of power at the expense of the reactionary and fascist forces.

It would be different if Russia was a socialist country and the people of Crimea had made the choice and demanded membership in a socialist union with Russia, as was the case with the accession of countries to the USSR.

The secession of Crimea and its integration into Russia will further strengthen the nationalist current in both Ukraine and Russia. It will trap millions of workers in an ethnic conflict, hiding the real causes of the conflict, as well as the only alternative that exists for workers and is on another path of development, socialism.

There is also the risk of "opening the bag of Aeolus" in other areas, especially in the Balkans, to lead to other integrations of areas, e.g. Kosovo's integration into the so-called "Greater Albania", which is linked to the annexation of territories by neighboring countries. There are, after all, examples from the partition of Yugoslavia which, in the name of the self-determination of the peoples, paved the way for border changes.

Developments confirm the supremacy of socialism in dealing with related problems. All the administrative changes in Crimea, from its proclamation to an autonomous democracy in 1921 under the USSR, to its administrative integration into Ukraine in the 1950s, took place smoothly and peacefully, because socialist relations of production prevailed and therefore the criterion was the interest of the working class and the people.

The people of Crimea, the people of Ukraine, the people of Russia have historical memories and positive experiences from the years of socialism, which are not erased even if more than 20 years have passed since the upheavals. The people of Crimea have vivid memories of the anti-fascist struggle of the Soviet people, who wrote History in the siege of Sevastopol. The fact that in various regions those seeking unity with Russia are protesting, among other things, with red flags expresses such a memory or expectation, although such an expectation does not really fit into today's reality and evolution. Because today Russia is a capitalist country, in competition with other imperialist centers, and its people are also suffering.

Historical experience teaches that in the conditions of socialism the peoples and ethnic groups in the USSR lived as brothers and progressed in peace, while now the nationalist-divisive poison is being poured. This other path must be followed by these peoples, all peoples, today "

 

--

 

26 Απριλίου 2022  ·

The most incomprehensible ideological obsession is that which comes from the Iranian and Afghan communists, who (most) adopt a narrative of the "Ukrainian" issue, which will be used proportionately to "legitimized" their own slaughter from the corresponding (like the Russian fascists) "eastern" fascists.

When the time comes, the theocrats and their lascivious for them "left-fascist" supporters, or the tolerant "neutrophils", will use the same arguments they use today.

You will remember me...

--

 

The mental rift within the world left is bigger than I previously thought was. I have personally experienced this rift when I came into conflict with the Greek left and anarchism on the occasion of the Kurdish issue and the genocide of the Yezidis by ISIS. There is also the issue of the Greek left's attitude towards the labor and democratic movement in Iran and Iraq.

Who was cared in the movement in Greece about the murder of Iranians and Iraqi workers and youth, when they revolted between 2018-2020?

Almost noone. Anti-Western-Anti-imperialism prevailed.

My personal narrative does not make sense, nor would I express it if the Ukrainian "issue" had not also arisen.

I see the same "anti-imperialist" disease, the same ideological and moral problem, the same lack of understanding of the problem of Eastern European / Russian and East-Asian imperialism.

There will be no easy way out of this ideological crisis within the world movement, because in addition to the ideological rift, there is also the mental rift.

Because I have experienced this rift at the "molecular" "micro level", on a nightmarish personal level, as a left-wing citizen in a "progressive" territory, the once "left" Greece, in which the left and anarchist ideas are widespread, I will say the following briefly:

The most of Marxists-Leninists, Stalinists and Trotskyists, and the post-colonial, anti-imperialist left, suffer now from ideological moral fanaticism and obscurantism.

--

 

To the psycho-complex "Orientals" and post-colonialists leftists:
Ukrainians are not "blue-eyed and blonde".
They are "black Cossacks and gypsies". Those of you who think like the Russian propaganda are "whites and blue-eyed", you are a left-wing Ku Klux Klan.

--

 

Towards sectarians: You do NOT keep an equal Marxist-revolutionary distance between western and eastern nationalism-imperialism.
You are queues and followers of Eastern nationalism-imperialism, most of the time without knowing it.
Once Tudeh forever Tudeh, that's you.

--

 

I will say it as simply as possible:

When the west is attacking you must be mainly anti-western, and when the east is attacking you must be mainly anti-eastern.

You sectarians what are you doing instead? when the west is attacking you are anti-western and when the east is attacking you keep saying that the west is to blame or you say that the west is to blame and also the east.

This is not even an equal distance, it is an indirect and for this reason more insidious and stupid favor to the east...

--

 

The critique of a value system in terms of the consistency of their realization can be done from the point of view of their defense or from the point of view of their deconstruction. The critique from the point of view of their deconstruction uses the inconsistency of the realization and the multiplicity of criteria to question the very existence of these values. When Eastern imperialists judge the hypocritical and inadequate realization of democratic values ​​on the part of the West, they do so because they hate those values. This nihilistic critique of the western capitalist pole, however, is exercised not only by Eastern imperialists but also by many Marxists, even if they say that they hold equal distances from all capitalisms and imperialisms...

--

 

They will say that the idea and the name of communism are slandered by their Stalinist use. Those who say this will be right, in terms of the deeper meaning of a classless society without a state, but I will also ask, why such an attachment to the name? A class-free society with direct democratic institutions is the purpose and the idea, the name does not matter, it is finished as a name, because historical names and emblems are determined by their historical use, so when misused they must be abandoned. The idea of ​​a classless workers' democracy lives on, communism is now a Stalinist zero...

--

 

I observe that a large part of the Russian propaganda for this war has been adopted and internalized in the world left.

Some points on this:

1. The expansionist tendency and colonial racism of Russian nationalism predates the current crisis. The tendency of the Ukrainian bourgeoisie and the Ukrainian working people to integrate into the Western imperialist camp is the result of a pre-existing Russian and formerly "Soviet" expansion.

(Soviet expansionism also expressed the dominance of Greater Russia within the Soviet Union and a supranational bureaucratic elite that oppressed working classes and ethnic groups).

When the leftists present the tendency of Ukrainian society to integrate into the West as (one) cause of Russian intervention, without analyzing the long-term context of Greater Russian chauvinism, they turn a real cause into an effect and an effect into a real cause.

What I am saying proves not only in the history of Russian-Ukrainian relations but also in the broader historical context of the relationship of all non-Russian ethnicities with the imperial state, whether it took the form of the great tsarist-Russian state or it took the form of the Soviet state. etc.

There is no non-Russian people in the wider territory of Russia who did not have problem with the tsarist, Soviet or neo-tsarist empire.

2. The propaganda of over-promotion of fascist tendencies within the Ukrainian nation continues. Of course, there is a problem with Ukrainian fascism, and this will increase after the Russian intervention, but the over-promotion of this problem has a specific function, to legitimize Russian propaganda, but also to "acquit" the sectarian left and cover its history responsibility, especially in relation to Ukrainian history.

The development of Ukrainian ultranationalism, and therefore fascism, is largely a reactionary response to the mass catastrophe brought about by the thoughtless hasty and ultimately criminal-genocidal plan of violent collectivization devised and implemented by the "Marxists", with the only objection the objection from heroic and slandered by the sectarians Bukharin.

The "Marxist" left knows its historical guilt, which is why it is lined up behind the Stalinist and then neo-tsarist (Putinist) propaganda. The left is "captive" in the Stalinist narrative and its historical "successors", despite the general ideological differences of all the political factors that make up this historical-interpretive drama.

After all, for example, even the "anti-Stalinist" Trotskyists did not disagree with the genocidal criminal plan of the violent collectivization of the land, since they criticized the Stalinists and the Bukharinists for ... being slow in its implementation!

3. The challenge by the historical left of Western propaganda, in the context of widespread historical suspicion, has led to conspiracy theories. There is Western propaganda but what is "heard" by the West is not always propaganda! It is not propaganda that Russian fascists use chemical weapons. They also showed it in Syria! It is not propaganda that the Russian fascists are raping, killing, destroying, leveling cities, massacring civilians. They also showed it in Syria.

--

 

 

 

Basic mistakes in the interpretation of war events. The main point of these errors in this text is that if Zelensky had declared "neutrality", there would have been war prevention and no intervention by the Russian imperialists. Russian imperialism does not consider Ukraine as a nation and the Ukrainian people as non-Russian. The clear Russian racist colonial motives of this war precede the issues that arose from the pro-Western turn of the bourgeois Ukrainian leadership and the Ukrainian people.

This analysis is indistinguishable from Stalinist type analyzes:

"Western imperialism is to blame, Eastern imperialism is also to blame, but mainly Western imperialism is to blame!"

 

 

 

از اوكراین چه خبر؟

فواد عبداللهی

تاریخ انتشار: ۱۱ آوریل ۲۰۲۲

----

• شصت هزار سرباز اوكراینی در جنوب و شرق اوكراین به محاصره‌ی نیروهای روسیه درآمده‌اند. دید روسیه اینست كه این نیروها به زودی با كمبود آب و مهمات مواجه می‌شوند و ظاهراً این كم‌هزینه‌ترین گزینه برای تسلیم این نیروها بدون كشتار و خونریزی است. بقیه‌ی ارتش اوكراین در مناطقی پراكنده‌اند كه به جز حملات پراكنده‌ی گاه و بی‌گاه به اهدافی كه چندان مهم و استراتژیك نیستند، ناتوان از انجام هر كاری و در محاصره قرار گرفته‌اند.

• از منظر ارتش روسیه، حمله به اوكراین از آغاز آن می‌بایست طوری سازماندهی شود كه با حداكثر ویران‌كردن زرادخانه‌ی نظامی طرف مقابل طراحی شود. برخی از رسانه‌های پرو- روسیه اعلام می‌كنند كه اظهارات پوتین از همان آغاز عملیات روی این نكته تاكید داشت كه باید از وارد كردن تلفات انسانی اجتناب كرد و همین تاكتیك باعث شده است كه عملیات به كُندی پیش برود. از سوی دیگر، زلینسكی و نیروهای اوكراینی در كنار تبلیغات مشمٸز كننده‌ی ناتو و رسانه‌های جنگی در غرب، تمام امید واهی خود را به پیشروی كُند ارتش روسیه بسته‌اند و ادعا می‌كنند كه «می‌توان جهان را به شكست روسیه متقاعد كرد».

• اما مشكل اصلی این جنگ در جای دیگریست. در شهری به نام: ماریوپل! در ماریوپل، نیروهای راست‌افراطی (فاشیست) كه عضو هنگ «آزوف» هستند، سنگر گرفته‌اند و اجازه خروج به هیچ بنی‌بشری از جمله مردم بی‌گناه و غیر نظامی را نمی‌دهند. این زاویه از منظره‌ی جنگ از جانب رسانه‌های غربی مطلقاً به تصویر كشیده نمی‌شود چون با استاندارد دوگانه و روایت غالب دول‌غربی از این جنگ در تناقض است. نگرانی واقعی هر انسان شریف مخالف این جنگ ارتجاعی اینست كه نابودكردن هنگ فاشیست «آزوف» توسط ارتش روسیه به ویرانی كامل شهر و كشتار مردم ختم شود كه این سناریو برای شهروندان ماریوپل هولناك خواهد بود.

• تا زمانی كه زلینسكی به جای اخذ سیاست بی‌طرفی و خنثی ماندن اوكراین در مجاورت با طرفین جنگ (روسیه - ناتو) كماكان در باد یكی، (ناتو) بخوابد، شمار هرچه بیشتری از نیروهای اوكراینی تلف خواهند شد و از اوكراین ویرانه به‌جا می‌ماند، صرف‌نظر از اینكه چه مقدار ادوات و تجهیزات نظامی را از طرف ناتو دریافت كند. نیروهای اوكراینی حتی آموزش كافی برای استفاده از این ابزارهای جنگی را ندارند. اما همه این «قهرمان»سازی‌ها و «پهلوان»بازی‌ها از نیروهای اوكراینی توسط رسانه‌های غربی به این روایت كمك می‌كند كه: ارتش روسیه در حال شكست است، پوتین یك شیطان است و به هیتلر شبیه است و باید كنار برود.

• علیرغم سایه سنگین استاندارد دوگانه رسانه‌ها، وزارت دفاع آمریكا اكنون توسط كسانی اداره می‌شود كه می‌دانند نباید وارد جنگ با روسیه شد. می‌دانند كه روسیه، عراق نیست و پوتین هم صدام و قذافی نیست. گزارش‌هایی از سوی سربازان آمریكایی كه از قبل در ارتش عملیات ویژه آمریكا و نیروی دریایی در اوكراین بوده‌اند، منتشر شده است كه می‌گویند جنگیدن در مقابل ارتش روسیه ساده نیست. با تجربیات ما در عراق و افغانستان كاملاً متفاوت و نامربوط است. وزارت دفاع آمریكا می‌داند كه جنگ علیه روسیه می‌تواند نیروگاه‌های اتمی این دولت با ۴۵۰۰ كلاهك هسته‌ای را به حالت فعال درآورد. روسیه در این زمینه تلویحاً گفته است كه اگر لازم بداند این گزینه را فعال می‌كند. درست است كه بلحاظ اقتصادی تفاوت فاحشی میان روسیه و آمریكا هست؛ اما قدرت اقتصادی به خودی خود دلیلی بر قدرت زرادخانه نظامی روسیه و ظرفیت بغایت هولناك و كشتارگونه‌ی عملی آن نیست.

• پارامتر دیگر اینست كه دولت چین می‌داند كه اگر غرب كار روسیه را بسازد، نوبت به تحركات آمریكا و ناتو برای تخریب و تنبیه اقتصادی چین خواهد رسید. آمریكا در صدد ایجاد بحران اوكراین دیگری در تایوان و در حوزه نفوذ چین است. در این زمینه آخرین خبرها حاكی از آنست كه مقامات دولت چین روز پنجشنبه نسبت به سفر قریب‌الوقوع نانسی پلوسی، رئیس مجلس نمایندگان آمریکا به تایوان به شدت هشدار دادند. پكن اعلام كرده است كه حمایت نظامی و سیاسی آمریکا از دولت حاکم بر تایوان را بر نمی‌تابد و تدابیر قاطعانه‌ای اتخاذ خواهد کرد. جناح‌هایی در هیٸت حاكمه آمریكا به بایدن وعده‌ی سر خرمن می‌دهند كه كش‌دادن جنگ در اوكراین، روسیه را فلج می‌كند و شكست روسیه می‌تواند به سرعت راه را برای تنبیه اقتصادی چین از طریق ایجاد اوكراین دیگری، اینبار در تایوان و در حوزه نفوذ چین هموار كند. اما دلایل زمینی‌تری وجود دارد كه موقعیت اقتصادی آمریكا ضعیف‌تر از قبل خواهد شد. فقط یك درصد افزایش نرخ بهره می‌تواند هم اكنون اقتصاد آمریكا را وارد عمیق‌ترین ركود اقتصادی در تاریخش بكند. این را اقتصاددانان مهم دولتی در آمریكا مرتب هشدار می‌دهند. بنابراین، بحران‌های جهانی كلان بعد از این جنگ هنوز در راهند. كافی است كه به افزایش قیمت مواد خوراكی، انرژی، كمبود غله، بهای فلزات و افزایش قیمت گازوٸیل، بدهی اقتصادی عظیم آمریكا را هم اضافه كنید تا با افزایش نرخ بهره و تورم سر به فلك كشیده مواجه شوید؛ تورمی كه اكنون اروپا را در نوردیده است.

• و نهایتاً، مدیر و مسٸول این وضعیت قبل از همه، آمریكا و ناتو است. زلینسكی اگر واقعاً رهبر مردم اوكراین بود، آنگونه كه رسانه‌های غربی بادش زده‌اند، می‌توانست در همان آغاز ورود ارتش روسیه به اوكراین بجای دمیدن در شیپور پروكاسیون جنگی و التماس از ناتو، فقط با اعلام این جمله به جهانینان كه «اوكراین بی‌طرف می‌ماند»، با یك تیر دو نشان بزند. هم آب پاكی روی دست دولت آمریكا و ناتو بریزد و هم بهانه‌های روسیه را خنثی كند و ارتش این كشور را با پاهای خود وادار به عقب‌نشینی كند. اما وی كماكان ترجیح داده است كه با آویزان شدن به ناتو، تكرار تراژدی افغانستان و نسخه‌ی كارتونی اشرف غنی در قلب اروپا باشد. چهره‌ی مخوف و جنایتكارانه‌ی این جنگ با هر توجیه و نیتی، علیرغم اینكه كفه ترازو به نفع كدام یك از طرفین قدرت، سنگینی كند و موقعیت طرفین متخاصم در این جنگ چه باشد، باید فوراً خنثی شود. از منظر یك شهروند عادی در مسكو، كی‌یف، لندن، پاریس، برلین و واشنگتن، این جنگ یك تخاصم ارتجاعی به‌تمام معنا میان بلوك‌های جهانی سرمایه است كه به نام وی، با مُهر و شناسنامه‌ی كاذب «روسی»، «اوكراینی»، «انگلیسی»، «فرانسوی»، «آلمانی» و «آمریكایی» صورت می‌گیرد و چهره‌ی كریه ناسیونالیسم و میهن‌پرستی را نمایان می‌كند. بازتاب این جنگ در جوامع غربی تاكنون كمر طبقه‌كارگر و مردم محروم را زیر بار كمرشكن اقتصادی و هجوم ده‌چندان دولت‌ها به سطح رفاه و معیشت‌اش، خم كرده است. دروغ‌گویی‌ و ریاكاری‌ رسانه‌های جنگی و دولتی به نام او تمام می‌شود؛ باید خواستار خنثی كردن جامعه اوكراین در این تخاصم ارتجاعی شد و آن را از میدان تاخت و تاز منافع دو سوی این جنگ مصون نگه داشت. این امری است كه جز با كمونیست‌های حامل این ایده در صفوف طبقه كارگر و بشریت مترقی برعلیه دخالت میلیتاریستی دولت‌های «خودی» در زمانه‌ی ما متصور نیست.

http://fuaad.net/?p=5202

 

 

 

 

 --------------

 

Ιt is really difficult to discern in the fire of a war, whether one is a direct participant or observer, the plots of the opposing and allied forces involved and encountered in the fire, in the sense that not only is it difficult to discern the gravity of each factor but also the "role" of the structural levels that make up each factor as autonomous in relation to the others but also as essentially related (again in relation to all the other factors).

I don't think it would make any sense to just lay out our views on a "theoretical map" in order to confirm them, although it is obvious to anyone who is not lying or deluding himself that this theoretical momentum will penetrate him as well.

The important thing is for one to learn from what one has not been able to gather before in the nets of one's theoretical composition, and it is true that those who are directly involved and consumed in the fire of war would be better able to speak about it.

The hasty judgment about the upheavals reserved by the war reality on the fronts of the "war positions" structures, on these very fronts but of course on those who have formed them, is more than wrong.

I am of the opinion that these upheavals can be perceived even as potentials only by those who share -even remotely- stable positions at the political and intellectual level, as long as they are ready to accept the weight of their position at the intellectual level, and not only at narrowly understood political level. Because we can say that you are the main factor, "you" yourself, of a narrowly limited (by the circumstances I would say) democratic movement and you think that you are a factor in the world social revolution (whatever you mean it).

The latter will have consequences even if decades pass, and then your quiet withdrawal from historical reality will be accompanied by the paradoxical (mental) return of the first narrative that pushed you to the historical scene that pushed you to the second and most essential narrative for which history called you. If you quickly put aside the first narrative, set by history and the second narrative (of adaptation), and face what we call reality, you can maintain a utopian arsenal and at some point bring it back, but alive, to claim primacy of reality.

And only then will it be possible for the idea to reappear at the top of things from the point of view of those who brought it into the world. Otherwise what will happen will be your participation in a world of memories that become the world, which if nothing else would have to exist, to trigger reality in its course and not in its return to a course which never existed, except as the abstract form of adolescent ignorance. There is no going back, there is no going back to a pre-frontal purity past.

The only struggles that exist in the war environment that is taking shape are frontal, and this is happening in a very cynical context that has blown up any smoothing notion of "frontal" shapes, which, after all, has never been a reality in practice.

The war world is a complex engagement, not a world where things are clarified and the clear lines of the "true" front are discovered.

Unless the Mazino line still has supporters. Theirs is their problem. When all the "troops" (friendly and hostile) have passed by them, from behind, let them wait in the overcrowding until at some point they all pass over them, because it is certain that the breaking of this kind of lines contains and such a moment.

Proponents of this case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online, in the last "glorious" moment of their defeat, which is especially important for anyone who wants to confirm that the whole world exists for one and only reason, to exterminate him as an innocent subject.

--

 

 

Inversion of reality.

If American and Western bourgeois politicians pushe harder for the downfall of Iran's theocrats, then the same person will speak against American imperialism and against the West.

Friends from the east, especially from Iran, you must decide what you want, and above all follow this mental rule:

Kill the Khomeini inside you.

 

Afsan Lotfi Moghadam

دولتمردان حرامزاده آمریکایی انگار میخوان اینا رو از سقوط نجات بدن

Οι μπάσταρδοι Αμερικανοί πολιτικοί φαίνεται ότι θέλουν να τους σώσουν από την κατάρρευση.

 

 --------

 

Ιωάννης Τζανάκος